Kennedy Brendan, Golazizian Preni, Trager Jackson, Atari Mohammad, Hoover Joe, Mostafazadeh Davani Aida, Dehghani Morteza
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jul 11;2(7):pgad210. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad210. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Humans use language toward hateful ends, inciting violence and genocide, intimidating and denigrating others based on their identity. Despite efforts to better address the language of hate in the public sphere, the psychological processes involved in hateful language remain unclear. In this work, we hypothesize that morality and hate are concomitant in language. In a series of studies, we find evidence in support of this hypothesis using language from a diverse array of contexts, including the use of hateful language in propaganda to inspire genocide (Study 1), hateful slurs as they occur in large text corpora across a multitude of languages (Study 2), and hate speech on social-media platforms (Study 3). In post hoc analyses focusing on particular moral concerns, we found that the type of moral content invoked through hate speech varied by context, with Purity language prominent in hateful propaganda and online hate speech and Loyalty language invoked in hateful slurs across languages. Our findings provide a new psychological lens for understanding hateful language and points to further research into the intersection of morality and hate, with practical implications for mitigating hateful rhetoric online.
人类将语言用于仇恨目的,煽动暴力和种族灭绝,基于他人的身份对其进行恐吓和诋毁。尽管人们努力在公共领域更好地应对仇恨语言,但仇恨语言所涉及的心理过程仍不明确。在这项研究中,我们假设道德与仇恨在语言中相伴而生。在一系列研究中,我们使用来自各种不同语境的语言,包括宣传中用于煽动种族灭绝的仇恨语言(研究1)、多种语言的大型文本语料库中出现的仇恨辱骂语(研究2)以及社交媒体平台上的仇恨言论(研究3),找到了支持这一假设的证据。在聚焦特定道德问题的事后分析中,我们发现仇恨言论所引发的道德内容类型因语境而异,纯洁性语言在仇恨宣传和网络仇恨言论中较为突出,而忠诚性语言则在多种语言的仇恨辱骂语中被提及。我们的研究结果为理解仇恨语言提供了一个新的心理学视角,并指出了对道德与仇恨交叉领域的进一步研究方向,这对于减轻网络仇恨言论具有实际意义。