Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistoranta 1c, Kuopio, Finland.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09744-6.
Pandemics such as COVID-19 pose threats to the physical safety of healthcare workers and students. They can have traumatic experiences affecting their personal and professional life. Increasing rates of burnout, substance abuse, depression, and suicide among healthcare workers have already been identified, thus making mental health and psychological wellbeing of the healthcare workers a major issue. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the characteristics of emotional support programs and interventions targeted to healthcare workers and students since the onset of COVID-19 and other SARS-CoV pandemics and to describe the effectiveness and experiences of these programs.
This was a mixed method systematic review. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the review was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42021262837]. Searches were conducted using Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. The COVIDENCE systematic review management system was used for data selection and extraction by two independent reviewers. The JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of selected studies by two additional reviewers. Finally, data extraction and narrative analysis were conducted.
The search retrieved 3161 results including 1061 duplicates. After screening, a total of 19 articles were included in this review. Participants in studies were nurses, physicians, other hospital staff, and undergraduate medical students mostly working on the front-line with COVID-19 patients. Publications included RCTs (n = 4), quasi-experimental studies (n = 2), cross-sectional studies (n = 6), qualitative interview studies (n = 3), and systematic reviews (n = 4). Most (63.4%) of the interventions used online or digital solutions. Interventions mostly showed good effectiveness (support-seeking, positive emotions, reduction of distress symptoms etc.) and acceptance and were experienced as helpful, but there were some conflicting results.
Healthcare organizations have developed support strategies focusing on providing emotional support for these healthcare workers and students, but it is difficult to conclude whether one program offers distinct benefit compared to the others. More research is needed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of emotional support interventions for health workers.
新冠等大流行对医护人员和学生的身体安全构成威胁,他们可能会经历创伤性事件,影响个人和职业生活。医护人员中已经出现倦怠、药物滥用、抑郁和自杀率上升等问题,因此医护人员的心理健康和心理幸福感成为一个主要问题。本系统评价的目的是综合自新冠疫情和其他 SARS-CoV 大流行以来针对医护人员和学生的情绪支持计划和干预措施的特点,并描述这些计划的效果和经验。
这是一项混合方法系统评价。我们遵循了《系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南,并在 PROSPERO [CRD42021262837]上进行了注册。使用 Medline、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆和 Scopus 数据库进行检索。使用 COVIDENCE 系统评价管理系统由两名独立审查员进行数据选择和提取。另外两名审查员使用 JBI(乔安娜·布里格斯研究所)批判性评估工具评估选定研究的质量。最后进行数据提取和叙述性分析。
检索到 3161 项结果,包括 1061 项重复项。经过筛选,共有 19 篇文章纳入本综述。研究中的参与者主要是护士、医生、其他医院工作人员和本科医学生,他们大多数在一线与新冠患者一起工作。出版物包括 RCT(n=4)、准实验研究(n=2)、横断面研究(n=6)、定性访谈研究(n=3)和系统评价(n=4)。大多数(63.4%)干预措施使用在线或数字解决方案。大多数干预措施显示出良好的效果(寻求支持、积极情绪、减轻痛苦症状等)和接受程度,并被认为是有帮助的,但也有一些相互矛盾的结果。
医疗保健组织已经制定了支持策略,重点是为这些医护人员和学生提供情绪支持,但很难得出一个方案与其他方案相比是否具有明显优势。需要进一步研究来评估针对卫生工作者的情绪支持干预措施的比较效果。