• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声特征及超声评分在附件区良恶性肿块鉴别中的应用

Ultrasound Features and Ultrasound Scores in the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.

作者信息

Pelayo Mar, Sancho-Sauco Javier, Sanchez-Zurdo Javier, Abarca-Martinez Leopoldo, Borrero-Gonzalez Carlota, Sainz-Bueno Jose Antonio, Alcazar Juan Luis, Pelayo-Delgado Irene

机构信息

HM Puerta del Sur, HM Rivas Hospital, 3428521 Madrid, Spain.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitary Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Alcalá de Henares University, 3428034 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;13(13):2152. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132152.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13132152
PMID:37443546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10341072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several ultrasound (US) features help ultrasound experts in the classification of benign vs. malignant adnexal masses. US scores serve in this differentiation, but they all have misdiagnoses. The main objective of this study is to evaluate what ultrasound characteristics are associated with malignancy influencing ultrasound scores.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of ultrasound features of adnexal lesions of women managed surgically. Ultrasound characteristics were analyzed, and masses were classified by subjective assessment of the ultrasonographer (SA) and other ultrasound scores (IOTA Simple Rules Risk Assessment SRRA, ADNEX model, and O-RADS).

RESULTS

Of a total of 187 adnexal masses studied, 134 were benign (71.7%) and 53 were malignant (28.3%). SA, IOTA SRRA, ADNEX model with or without CA125 and O-RADS had high levels of sensitivity (93.9%, 81.1%, 94.3%, 88.7%, 98.1%) but lower specificity (80.2%, 82.1%, 82.8%, 77.6%, 73.1%) with similar AUC (0.87, 0.87, 0.92, 0.90, 0.86). Ultrasound features significantly related with malignancy were the presence of irregular contour, absence of acoustic shadowing, vascularized solid areas, ≥1 papillae, vascularized septum, and moderate-severe ascites.

CONCLUSION

IOTA SRRA, ADNEX model, and O-RADS can help in the classification of benign and malignant masses. Certain ultrasound characteristics studied in ultrasound scores are associated with malignancy.

摘要

背景

多种超声(US)特征有助于超声专家对附件区良恶性肿块进行分类。超声评分在这种鉴别中发挥作用,但它们都存在误诊情况。本研究的主要目的是评估哪些超声特征与影响超声评分的恶性肿瘤相关。

方法

这是一项对接受手术治疗的女性附件区病变超声特征的回顾性分析。分析了超声特征,并通过超声检查者的主观评估(SA)和其他超声评分(IOTA简单规则风险评估SRRA、ADNEX模型和O-RADS)对肿块进行分类。

结果

在总共研究的187个附件区肿块中,134个为良性(71.7%),53个为恶性(28.3%)。SA、IOTA SRRA、含或不含CA125的ADNEX模型以及O-RADS具有较高的敏感性(93.9%、81.1%、94.3%、88.7%、98.1%),但特异性较低(80.2%、82.1%、82.8%、77.6%、73.1%),AUC相似(0.87、0.87、0.92、0.90、0.86)。与恶性肿瘤显著相关的超声特征包括轮廓不规则、无声影、实性区域有血管、≥1个乳头、血管化隔膜以及中重度腹水。

结论

IOTA SRRA、ADNEX模型和O-RADS有助于对良恶性肿块进行分类。超声评分中研究的某些超声特征与恶性肿瘤相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/6f5edee4db0f/diagnostics-13-02152-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/fe8caf59b53b/diagnostics-13-02152-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/3c58cd5225d7/diagnostics-13-02152-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/b35a277ce945/diagnostics-13-02152-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/0050ca7d439a/diagnostics-13-02152-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/4de5d981292f/diagnostics-13-02152-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/6f5edee4db0f/diagnostics-13-02152-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/fe8caf59b53b/diagnostics-13-02152-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/3c58cd5225d7/diagnostics-13-02152-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/b35a277ce945/diagnostics-13-02152-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/0050ca7d439a/diagnostics-13-02152-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/4de5d981292f/diagnostics-13-02152-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae53/10341072/6f5edee4db0f/diagnostics-13-02152-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrasound Features and Ultrasound Scores in the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.超声特征及超声评分在附件区良恶性肿块鉴别中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;13(13):2152. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132152.
2
Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.超声评分(主观评估、简单规则风险评估、ADNEX模型、O-RADS)在分类困难的附件包块中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(17):2785. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172785.
3
Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.超声评分在鉴别附件区良恶性肿块中的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;13(7):1307. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071307.
4
Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.IOTA简易规则、简易规则风险评估、ADNEX模型和O-RADS在北美女性附件区良恶性病变鉴别中的表现
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;59(5):668-676. doi: 10.1002/uog.24777. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
5
O-RADS Classification for Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Masses: Agreement between IOTA Lexicon and ADNEX Model for Assigning Risk Group.附件包块超声评估的O-RADS分类:IOTA词汇表与ADNEX模型在风险分组判定上的一致性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;13(4):673. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040673.
6
Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.与CA125和HE4联合ROMA算法相比,IOTA简单规则风险评估、ADNEX模型及主观评估在鉴别良性、交界性和I期恶性附件病变中的性能。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 25;13(5):885. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050885.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.基于超声的风险模型在区分美国队列中良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤的诊断性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323289. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23289.
8
Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population.验证 ADNEX 和 IOTA 两步策略,并估计低危人群附件包块随访期间并发症的风险。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Sep;64(3):395-404. doi: 10.1002/uog.27642. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
9
Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.附件包块恶性风险评估:ADNEX模型的外部验证及与其他常用超声方法的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):784-792. doi: 10.1002/uog.17225.
10
Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study.附件包块中国际卵巢肿瘤分析ADNEX模型和卵巢附件报告与数据系统与最终组织学诊断的比较:一项回顾性研究
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Jan;67(1):86-93. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23061. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of ADNEX Model with GI-RADS Ultrasound Scoring System in Evaluation of Adnexal Mass.ADNEX模型与GI-RADS超声评分系统在附件包块评估中的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Apr;75(Suppl 1):86-92. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-02000-9. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS) in Preoperative Evaluation of Adnexal Masses.妇科影像报告和数据系统(GI-RADS)在附件包块术前评估中的诊断效能
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 7;61(4):679. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040679.
3
ECO-SCORE: Development of a New Ultrasound Score for the Study of Cystic and Solid-Cystic Adnexal Masses Based on Imaging Characteristics.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.超声评分在鉴别附件区良恶性肿块中的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;13(7):1307. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071307.
2
Sonographic characteristics of ovarian Leydig cell tumor.卵巢莱迪希细胞瘤的超声特征
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;62(3):441-442. doi: 10.1002/uog.26212.
3
Contribution of Outpatient Ultrasound Transvaginal Biopsy and Puncture in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pelvic Lesions: A Bicenter Study.
ECO评分:基于影像学特征开发一种用于研究囊性及实性-囊性附件包块的新型超声评分系统。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 29;13(2):317. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020317.
4
Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency between the O-RADS US risk stratification system and doctors' subjective judgment.O-RADS US 风险分层系统与医生主观判断的诊断效能比较。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01153-9.
5
Clinical value of quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic tumors.超声造影定量分析在盆腔良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的临床价值
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):6636-6645. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-582. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
6
Validation of the diagnostic efficacy of O-RADS in adnexal masses.附件包块 O-RADS 诊断效能的验证。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 21;13(1):15667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42836-1.
7
Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.超声评分(主观评估、简单规则风险评估、ADNEX模型、O-RADS)在分类困难的附件包块中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;13(17):2785. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172785.
门诊经阴道超声活检及穿刺在盆腔病变诊断与治疗中的作用:一项双中心研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;13(3):380. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030380.
4
Delay in adjuvant chemotherapy administration for patients with FIGO stage I epithelial ovarian carcinoma is associated with worse survival; an analysis of the National Cancer Database.FIGO 分期Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌患者辅助化疗延迟与生存不良相关;基于国家癌症数据库的分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Aug;166(2):263-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Comparison of the O-RADS and ADNEX models regarding malignancy rate and validity in evaluating adnexal lesions.比较 O-RADS 和 ADNEX 模型在评估附件病变中的恶性率和有效性。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7854-7864. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08803-6. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
External Validation of O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System.O-RADS US 风险分层和管理系统的外部验证。
Radiology. 2022 Jul;304(1):114-120. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211868. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
7
Imaging in gynecological disease (24): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian mature cystic teratomas.妇科疾病影像学(二十四):卵巢成熟囊性畸胎瘤的临床及超声特征。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;60(4):549-558. doi: 10.1002/uog.24904. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.IOTA 简单规则、O-RADS 和 CA125 对鉴别附件区良恶性肿块的效能。
J Ovarian Res. 2022 Jan 23;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-00947-9.
9
Key changes to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of female genital tumours introduced in the 5th edition (2020).世界卫生组织(世卫组织)女性生殖器官肿瘤分类的重大修订第五版(2020 年)。
Histopathology. 2022 Apr;80(5):762-778. doi: 10.1111/his.14609. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
10
Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and ADNEX for Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: An External Validation Study Conducted by Junior Sonologists.O-RADS、GI-RADS和ADNEX在附件肿物诊断中的比较:初级超声科医生进行的外部验证研究
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jun;41(6):1497-1507. doi: 10.1002/jum.15834. Epub 2021 Sep 21.