Blood Pressure Targets for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND

With ideal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets in resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients unknown, we performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effects of higher versus lower MAP targets.

METHODS

We searched four databases until 1 May 2023 for RCTs reporting the effects of higher MAP targets (>70 mmHg) in resuscitated OHCA patients and conducted random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was mortality while secondary outcomes were neurological evaluations, arrhythmias, acute kidney injury, and durations of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. We conducted inverse-variance weighted strata-level meta-regression against a proportion of non-survivors to assess differences between reported MAPs. We also conducted a trial sequential analysis of RCTs.

RESULTS

Four RCTs were included. Higher MAP was not associated with reduced mortality (OR: 1.09, 95%-CI: 0.84 to 1.42, = 0.51), or improved neurological outcomes (OR: 0.99, 95%-CI: 0.77 to 1.27, = 0.92). Such findings were consistent despite additional sensitivity analyses. Our robust variance strata-level meta-regression revealed no significant associations between mean MAP and the proportion of non-survivors (B: 0.029, 95%-CI: -0.023 to 0.081, = 0.162), and trial sequential analysis revealed no meaningful survival benefit for higher MAPs.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher MAP target was not significantly associated with improved mortality and neurological outcomes in resuscitated OHCA patients.