Bücklein Veit, Perez Ariel, Rejeski Kai, Iacoboni Gloria, Jurinovic Vindi, Holtick Udo, Penack Olaf, Kharboutli Soraya, Blumenberg Viktoria, Ackermann Josephine, Frölich Lisa, Johnson Grace, Patel Kedar, Arciola Brian, Mhaskar Rahul, Wood Anthony, Schmidt Christian, Albanyan Omar, Gödel Philipp, Hoster Eva, Bullinger Lars, Mackensen Andreas, Locke Frederick, von Bergwelt Michael, Barba Pere, Subklewe Marion, Jain Michael D
Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Laboratory for Translational Cancer Immunology, LMU Gene Center, Munich, Germany.
Hemasphere. 2023 Jul 11;7(8):e907. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000907. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Real-world evidence suggests a trend toward inferior survival of patients receiving CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in Europe (EU) and with tisagenlecleucel. The underlying logistic, patient- and disease-related reasons for these discrepancies remain poorly understood. In this multicenter retrospective observational study, we studied the patient-individual journey from CAR-T indication to infusion, baseline features, and survival outcomes in 374 patients treated with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) or axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel) in EU and the United States (US). Compared with US patients, EU patients had prolonged indication-to-infusion intervals (66 versus 50 d; < 0.001) and more commonly received intermediary therapies (holding and/or bridging therapy, 94% in EU versus 74% in US; < 0.001). Baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (median 321 versus 271 U/L; = 0.02) and ferritin levels (675 versus 425 ng/mL; = 0.004) were significantly elevated in the EU cohort. Overall, we observed inferior survival in EU patients (median progression-free survival [PFS] 3.1 versus 9.2 months in US; < 0.001) and with tisa-cel (3.2 versus 9.2 months with axi-cel; < 0.001). On multivariate Lasso modeling, nonresponse to bridging, elevated ferritin, and increased C-reactive protein represented independent risks for treatment failure. Weighing these variables into a patient-individual risk balancer (high risk [HR] balancer), we found higher levels in EU versus US and tisa-cel versus axi-cel cohorts. Notably, superior PFS with axi-cel was exclusively evident in patients at low risk for progression (according to the HR balancer), but not in high-risk patients. These data demonstrate that inferior survival outcomes in EU patients are associated with longer time-to-infusion intervals, higher tumor burden/LDH levels, increased systemic inflammatory markers, and CAR-T product use.
真实世界证据表明,在欧洲(EU)接受CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法以及使用tisagenlecleucel治疗的患者生存情况有较差的趋势。这些差异背后的逻辑、患者及疾病相关原因仍知之甚少。在这项多中心回顾性观察研究中,我们研究了374例在欧盟和美国接受tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)或axi-cabtagene-ciloleucel(axi-cel)治疗的患者从CAR-T适应症到输注的个体历程、基线特征和生存结果。与美国患者相比,欧盟患者的适应症到输注间隔时间更长(66天对50天;<0.001),且更常接受中间治疗(维持和/或桥接治疗,欧盟为94%,美国为74%;<0.001)。欧盟队列的基线乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平(中位数321对271 U/L;P = 0.02)和铁蛋白水平(675对425 ng/mL;P = 0.004)显著升高。总体而言,我们观察到欧盟患者的生存情况较差(中位无进展生存期[PFS]美国为9.2个月,欧盟为3.1个月;<0.001),使用tisa-cel的患者也是如此(tisa-cel为3.2个月,axi-cel为9.2个月;<0.001)。在多变量套索模型中,对桥接治疗无反应、铁蛋白升高和C反应蛋白增加是治疗失败的独立风险因素。将这些变量纳入个体患者风险平衡器(高风险[HR]平衡器),我们发现欧盟队列和tisa-cel队列相对于美国队列和axi-cel队列的风险水平更高。值得注意的是,axi-cel带来的更好的PFS仅在进展风险较低的患者中明显(根据HR平衡器),而在高风险患者中则不然。这些数据表明,欧盟患者较差的生存结果与更长的输注间隔时间、更高的肿瘤负荷/LDH水平、全身炎症标志物增加以及CAR-T产品的使用有关。