Suppr超能文献

离焦和倾斜对各种非共面性设计的非球面单焦点人工晶状体光学性能的实验室评估

Laboratory Evaluation of Optical Performance of Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses With Various Anti-misalignment Designs Under the Influence of Decentration and Tilt.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2023 Jul;39(7):446-455. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230605-02. Epub 2023 Jul 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness and characteristics of aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different anti-misalignment designs.

METHODS

Three types of anti-misalignment IOLs (with aspheric balance curve design, ZO optic design, and high-order optical aspheric surface design) and no anti-misalignment IOLs were involved. From each type of these IOLs, +8.00, +17.00, and +26.00 diopter (D) lenses were used for detection at the 3- and 4.5-mm apertures. The modulation transfer function (MTF) and 50% of the maximum value of the MTF (MTF50) were measured while IOLs were centered, decentered by 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mm, and tilted by 3, 5, and 7 degrees.

RESULTS

Within the average clinical range of IOL malpositions (0.3-mm decentration or 3.00-D tilt), the anti-misalignment design slightly reduced the negative effect of decentration and tilt ( = .1845 and .6495, test) on the optical performance of IOLs. Beyond the average range, the anti-misalignment design narrowed the reductions of MTF50 from 23.18% to 8.60% for decentration and from 40.31% to 27.96% for tilt ( = .0010, two-factor analysis of variance). The optical performance varied in anti-misalignment IOLs with different diopters, types, and degrees of malpositions at different aperture sizes. In both photopic and mesopic conditions and all probable misalignments, from the perspective of MTF50, better sharpness generally may be achieved with the 8.00-D ZO optic designed lens and 17.00-D high-order optical aspheric surface designed lens. For 26.00-D IOLs with different misalignments, the ABC design was more resistant to decentrations, whereas the high-order optical aspheric surface design was more resistant to tilts.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspheric monofocal IOLs with an anti-misalignment design can effectively resist decentration and tilt. Anti-misalignment IOLs for complicated cataract could be selected according to diopter of IOL and types and degrees of probable IOL malpositions. .

摘要

目的

评估具有不同防错设计的非球面单焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的有效性和特点。

方法

涉及三种类型的防错 IOL(具有非球面平衡曲线设计、ZO 光学设计和高阶光学非球面设计)和无防错 IOL。在 3 毫米和 4.5 毫米孔径处,使用每种 IOL 的+8.00、+17.00 和+26.00 屈光度(D)透镜进行检测。当 IOL 居中、偏心 0.3、0.5 和 0.7 毫米以及倾斜 3、5 和 7 度时,测量调制传递函数(MTF)和 MTF 的 50%最大值(MTF50)。

结果

在 IOL 位置的平均临床范围内(0.3 毫米偏心或 3.00-D 倾斜),防错设计略微降低了偏心和倾斜对 IOL 光学性能的负面影响(=0.1845 和 0.6495,检验)。超出平均范围后,防错设计缩小了 MTF50 的降低幅度,从偏心的 23.18%缩小到 8.60%,从倾斜的 40.31%缩小到 27.96%(=0.0010,双因素方差分析)。在不同孔径尺寸下,具有不同屈光度、类型和错位程度的防错 IOL 的光学性能各不相同。在明视和中视条件下以及所有可能的错位情况下,从 MTF50 的角度来看,对于 8.00-D ZO 光学设计的透镜和 17.00-D 高阶光学非球面设计的透镜,通常可以获得更好的清晰度。对于具有不同错位的 26.00-D IOL,ABC 设计对偏心更具抵抗力,而高阶光学非球面设计对倾斜更具抵抗力。

结论

具有防错设计的非球面单焦点 IOL 可以有效抵抗偏心和倾斜。可以根据 IOL 的屈光度和可能的 IOL 错位的类型和程度选择用于复杂白内障的防错 IOL。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验