Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.
The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Aug;51(10):2617-2624. doi: 10.1177/03635465231181082. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
Deltoid ligament injuries occur in isolation as well as with ankle fractures and other ligament injuries. Both operative treatment and nonoperative treatment are used, but debate on optimal treatment continues. Likewise, the best method of surgical repair of the deltoid ligament remains unclear.
To determine the biomechanical role of native anterior and posterior components of the deltoid ligament in ankle stability and to determine the efficacy of simple suture versus augmented repair.
Controlled laboratory study.
Ten cadaveric ankles (mean age, 51 years; age range, 34-64 years; all male specimens) were mounted on a 6 degrees of freedom robotic arm. Each specimen underwent biomechanical testing in 8 states: (1) intact, (2) anterior deltoid cut, (3) anterior repair, (4) tibiocalcaneal augmentation, (5) deep anterior tibiotalar augmentation, (6) posterior deltoid cut, (7) posterior repair, and (8) complete deltoid cut. Testing consisted of anterior drawer, eversion, and external rotation (ER), each performed at neutral and 25° of plantarflexion. A 1-factor, random-intercepts, linear mixed-effect model was created, and all pairwise comparisons were made between testing states.
Cutting the anterior deltoid introduced ER (+2.1°; = .009) and eversion laxity (+6.2° of eversion; < .001) at 25 degrees of plantarflexion. Anterior deltoid repair restored native ER but not eversion. Tibiocalcaneal augmentation reduced eversion laxity, but tibiotalar augmentation provided no additional benefit. The posterior deltoid tear showed no increase in laxity. Complete tear introduced significant anterior translation, ER, and eversion laxity (+7.6 mm of anterior translation, +13.8° ER and +33.6° of eversion; < .001).
A complete deltoid tear caused severe instability of the ankle joint. Augmented anterior repair was sufficient to stabilize the complete tear, and no additional benefit was provided by posterior repair. For isolated anterior tear, repair with tibiocalcaneal augmentation was the optimal treatment.
Deltoid repair with augmentation may reduce or avoid the need for prolonged postoperative immobilization and encourage accelerated rehabilitation, preventing stiffness and promoting earlier return to preinjury activity.
三角韧带损伤可单独发生,也可与踝关节骨折和其他韧带损伤同时发生。目前既可以采用手术治疗,也可以采用非手术治疗,但关于最佳治疗方法的争论仍在继续。同样,三角韧带的最佳手术修复方法也不明确。
确定踝关节稳定性中原位前、后三角韧带的生物力学作用,并确定单纯缝合与增强修复的疗效。
对照实验室研究。
10 个尸体踝关节(平均年龄 51 岁;年龄范围 34-64 岁;均为男性标本)被安装在 6 自由度机器人臂上。每个标本在 8 种状态下进行生物力学测试:(1)完整,(2)切断前三角韧带,(3)前三角韧带修复,(4)距跟骨增强,(5)深前胫距增强,(6)切断后三角韧带,(7)后三角韧带修复,(8)完全切断三角韧带。测试包括前抽屉试验、外翻和外旋,均在中立位和 25°跖屈位进行。创建了 1 因素随机截距线性混合效应模型,并对所有测试状态进行了两两比较。
切断前三角韧带可导致外旋(+2.1°; =.009)和外翻松弛(+6.2°外翻; <.001)在 25 度跖屈。前三角韧带修复恢复了原有外旋,但没有恢复外翻。距跟骨增强可减少外翻松弛,但胫距增强没有提供额外的益处。后三角韧带撕裂没有增加松弛度。完全撕裂导致明显的前向移位、外旋和外翻松弛(前向移位 7.6mm,外旋 13.8°,外翻 33.6°; <.001)。
完全的三角韧带撕裂会导致踝关节严重不稳定。增强前韧带修复足以稳定完全撕裂,后韧带修复没有提供额外的益处。对于孤立的前撕裂,采用距跟骨增强的修复是最佳治疗方法。
三角韧带修复加增强可能减少或避免术后长时间固定的需要,并鼓励加速康复,防止僵硬,促进更早地恢复到受伤前的活动。