Department of Imaging, Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Languedocia, Montpellier, France.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2023 Sep;64(5):936-944. doi: 10.1111/vru.13277. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Modifications of splenic parenchyma are common ultrasonographic findings in dogs. Splenic fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a rapid, safe procedure, routinely performed in veterinary institutions. However, 22-gauge (G) needle usually reported is selected according to general practice and the most appropriate needle size to be used remains unclear. The aim of this prospective, single-center, methods comparison study was to assess the effect of needle size on cytologic specimens' evaluation and animal welfare during the procedure. Dogs underwent ultrasound-guided splenic FNA using 23, 25, and 27G needles. Needles were compared based on initial and then detailed cytologic evaluation. The initial evaluation assessed overall cellularity, cell preservation, hemodilution, and detailed cytologic evaluation referred to exhaustive splenic components. Welfare evaluation was performed based on a scoring system. A total of 54 dogs were included in this study with 54 of 54 welfare evaluations and 35 of 54 cytologic evaluations by one or two European College of Veterinary Clinical Pathology-certified cytologists. The final cytologic diagnosis was unchanged regardless of the needle size. For the initial evaluation, 23G needles provided significantly higher cellularity than the 27G needles. For detailed cytologic evaluation, only the richness in mesothelial cells and stroma was affected by needle size. Pain induced by the procedures was considered low using 23, 25, and 27G needles with the 27G needle producing the least adverse reactions. Findings from the current study supported using needle gauges smaller than the previously published standard 22G needle for spleen ultrasound-guided fine needle nonaspiration in dogs. Due to higher cellularity and lower pain scores, authors recommend the use of 23G needles with a nonaspiration technique.
脾脏实质的改变是犬类超声检查的常见发现。脾脏细针抽吸(FNA)是一种快速、安全的程序,在兽医机构中常规进行。然而,通常根据一般实践选择 22 号(G)针,而使用的最合适的针的大小仍不清楚。本前瞻性、单中心、方法比较研究的目的是评估针的大小对细胞学标本评估和手术过程中动物福利的影响。狗接受了超声引导下的脾脏 FNA,使用了 23、25 和 27G 针。根据初始和详细的细胞学评估比较了这些针。初始评估评估了总体细胞数量、细胞保存、血液稀释和详细的细胞学评估,涉及到脾脏的所有成分。福利评估是基于评分系统进行的。本研究共纳入 54 只狗,其中 54 只进行了福利评估,35 只进行了 1 名或 2 名欧洲兽医临床病理学学院认证细胞学专家的细胞学评估。无论针的大小如何,最终的细胞学诊断都没有改变。对于初始评估,23G 针提供的细胞数量明显高于 27G 针。对于详细的细胞学评估,只有间皮细胞和基质的丰富度受到针大小的影响。使用 23、25 和 27G 针,程序引起的疼痛被认为是低的,而 27G 针产生的不良反应最少。本研究的结果支持在狗的脾脏超声引导下细针非抽吸中使用比以前发表的标准 22G 针更小的针管。由于更高的细胞数量和更低的疼痛评分,作者建议使用 23G 针进行非抽吸技术。