Suppr超能文献

P074:在初治的溃疡性结肠炎患者中,维多珠单抗与抗TNFα药物相比,艰难梭菌感染的比较风险

P074 Comparative Risk of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa Agents in Biologic-Naïve Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

作者信息

Dalal Rahul, Mitri Jennifer, Goodrick Hannah, Allegretti Jessica

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 1;116(Suppl 1):S19. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000798896.93843.63.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with adverse outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). There is concern that vedolizumab, which inhibits lymphocyte trafficking to the intestines, may increase the risk of gastrointestinal infections such as CDI when compared to other biologics. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine if vedolizumab is associated with an increased risk of CDI compared to anti-TNFa agents in UC.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with UC initiating infliximab, adalimumab, or vedolizumab 6/1/14-12/31/20 at a large academic health system. Electronic records were manually reviewed. Patients with Crohn's disease, indeterminate colitis, prior biologic exposures, prior colectomy, and non-UC indications for biologics were excluded. Patients were followed until CDI, colectomy, biologic discontinuation/switch, or last gastroenterology encounter through 8/1/21. The primary outcome was time from biologic initiation to first CDI, defined as positive stool C. difficile toxin or toxigenic C. difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with associated CDI antibiotic prescriptions. Secondary outcomes included CDI-related hospitalization, colectomy, or death within 30 days of CDI. The primary exposure was vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa therapy. Other independent variables included demographics and UC history/severity factors. Propensity scores (PSs) were calculated using logistic regression of vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa on the following covariates: age, sex, Caucasian, body mass index (BMI), disease duration, current systemic corticosteroid use, UC-related hospitalization within prior 12 months, last Mayo endoscopic subscore, Montreal disease extent, albumin, and malignancy history. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed using PSs. An univariable Cox proportional hazards model was fit to calculate the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of CDI for vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa. A multivariable, IPT-weighted Cox model was then fit with two additional covariates extrinsic to the PS: pre-biologic CDI and immunomodulator exposure (time-varying covariate). Patients were censored at loss of follow-up, biologic discontinuation, or colectomy.

RESULTS

805 UC patients initiated vedolizumab (n = 195) or anti-TNFa agents (n = 610). Vedolizumab patients were older and less commonly received systemic corticosteroids or had UC-related hospitalization within 12 months pre-biologic initiation. There were 43 CDIs over 1,436 patient-years follow-up. CDI and CDI hospitalization occurred less commonly with vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa (CDI: 1.0% vs 6.7%, p = 0.001; CDI hospitalization: 1.0% vs 3.8%, p = 0.042 by log-rank test). There were no differences in colectomies or deaths or exposure to antibiotics/corticosteroids during follow-up or within 30 days preceding CDI. The unadjusted Cox model demonstrated a lower hazard of CDI for vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.71). The multivariable IPT-weighted Cox model demonstrated no difference in hazard of CDI for vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.05-2.03) or immunomodulator exposure (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.41-2.40). Pre-biologic CDI was associated with an increased hazard of CDI (HR 5.95, 95% CI 2.93-12.09). Among patients who developed CDI, 17/43 (39.5%) had pre-biologic CDI a median of 227 days (IQR 160-550 days) preceding CDI.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not identify an increased risk of CDI associated with vedolizumab vs anti-TNFa agents after controlling for UC severity. We hope that these findings will reassure UC providers considering vedolizumab as a first-line biologic agent in the context of gastrointestinal infectious risks.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)与溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的不良结局相关。有人担心,与其他生物制剂相比,抑制淋巴细胞向肠道转运的维多珠单抗可能会增加胃肠道感染如CDI的风险。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定与抗TNFα药物相比,维多珠单抗在UC患者中是否与CDI风险增加相关。

方法

对2014年6月1日至2020年12月31日在一个大型学术医疗系统中开始使用英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗或维多珠单抗的成年UC患者进行回顾性队列研究。对电子记录进行人工审查。排除患有克罗恩病、不确定性结肠炎、既往有生物制剂暴露史、既往接受过结肠切除术以及因非UC适应症使用生物制剂的患者。对患者进行随访,直至发生CDI、结肠切除术、生物制剂停用/更换或截至2021年8月1日的最后一次胃肠病学就诊。主要结局是从开始使用生物制剂到首次发生CDI的时间,定义为粪便艰难梭菌毒素检测阳性或产毒艰难梭菌聚合酶链反应(PCR)阳性且伴有CDI抗生素处方。次要结局包括CDI相关的住院治疗、结肠切除术或CDI发生后30天内的死亡。主要暴露因素是维多珠单抗与抗TNFα治疗。其他独立变量包括人口统计学和UC病史/严重程度因素。使用维多珠单抗与抗TNFα在以下协变量上的逻辑回归计算倾向评分(PS):年龄、性别、白种人、体重指数(BMI)、病程、当前全身使用皮质类固醇、过去12个月内与UC相关的住院治疗、最后一次梅奥内镜亚评分、蒙特利尔疾病范围、白蛋白和恶性肿瘤病史。使用PS进行治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)。拟合单变量Cox比例风险模型以计算维多珠单抗与抗TNFα相比CDI的未调整风险比(HR)。然后拟合多变量、IPTW加权Cox模型,加入PS之外的两个额外协变量:生物制剂治疗前CDI和免疫调节剂暴露(随时间变化的协变量)。患者在失访、生物制剂停用或结肠切除时进行截尾。

结果

805例UC患者开始使用维多珠单抗(n = 195)或抗TNFα药物(n = 610)。使用维多珠单抗的患者年龄较大,在开始使用生物制剂前12个月内较少接受全身皮质类固醇治疗或与UC相关的住院治疗。在1436患者年的随访期间有43例CDI发生。与抗TNFα相比,维多珠单抗组的CDI和CDI住院发生率较低(CDI:1.0%对6.7%,p = 0.001;CDI住院:1.0%对3.8%,对数秩检验p = 0.042)。在随访期间或CDI发生前30天内,结肠切除术、死亡或抗生素/皮质类固醇暴露方面没有差异。未调整的Cox模型显示,与抗TNFα相比,维多珠单抗发生CDI的风险较低(HR 0.17,95%CI 0.04 - 0.71)。多变量IPTW加权Cox模型显示,维多珠单抗与抗TNFα相比CDI风险无差异(HR 0.33,95%CI 0.05 - 2.03)或免疫调节剂暴露无差异(HR 1.01,95%CI 0.41 - 2.40)。生物制剂治疗前CDI与CDI风险增加相关(HR 5.95,95%CI 2.93 - 12.09)。在发生CDI的患者中,17/43(39.5%)在CDI前中位227天(IQR 160 - 550天)有生物制剂治疗前CDI。

结论

在控制UC严重程度后,我们的研究未发现与抗TNFα药物相比,维多珠单抗会增加CDI风险。我们希望这些发现能让考虑将维多珠单抗作为胃肠道感染风险背景下一线生物制剂的UC治疗医生放心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验