Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Institute of Public Health and Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Pakistan.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Jan 1;26(1):63-71. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad125.
Despite evidence on the effectiveness of tobacco cessation interventions in dental settings, the implementation remains low, especially for smokeless tobacco (ST). The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of the influences governing the implementation of ST cessation support in dental hospitals.
A multicenter qualitative study was conducted at two tertiary-care dental hospitals, in Pakistan. Semi-structured interview guide, guided by the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model, were used to capture the views of dentists (n = 12) and dental patients (n = 12), regarding ST cessation support in dental hospitals. Framework approach was used to thematically analyze the data.
Screening of ST users in routine dental practice was seldom practiced and the cessation support offered was brief advice. Barriers identified by dentists included: Fear of offending and stereotyping patients; lack of knowledge and skills; lack of privacy; lack of belief in the effectiveness of behavioral support; lack of time and workload pressure; ST use amongst dentists; lack of referral systems and; the absence of a mandatory requirement of offering ST cessation support. Facilitators included: Delivering support through junior dentists and the length of interaction between the dentist and the patient. Naswar was the most common ST product used by dental patients. Patients reported receiving negligible cessation support from any healthcare provider.
A range of influences governing the implementation of ST cessation support in dental hospitals were identified. These findings can inform the implementation of behavioral interventions for ST cessation in dental and other clinical settings, in low and middle-income countries.
Smokeless tobacco control considerably lags, in comparison to the control of combustible tobacco. This is the first study that qualitatively explores the implementation of ST cessation support in dental settings in Pakistan. Utilizing the "Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior" model, it provides an in-depth understanding of the inability of dentists in implementing effective behavioral interventions for ST cessation support in routine dental practice. Highlighting the striking discrepancy between the patient's need for and receptivity towards cessation support and the dentists' concerns over their patients' receptivity towards cessation support, it calls for the need for effective implementation strategies to optimize dentist-led tobacco cessation interventions in low-resource settings.
尽管有证据表明在牙科环境中实施戒烟干预措施的有效性,但实施率仍然很低,尤其是针对无烟烟草(ST)。本研究的目的是了解影响牙科医院实施 ST 戒烟支持的因素。
在巴基斯坦的两家三级保健牙科医院进行了一项多中心定性研究。使用半结构化访谈指南,以能力-机会-动机-行为(COM-B)模型为指导,了解牙医(n=12)和牙科患者(n=12)对牙科医院提供 ST 戒烟支持的看法。使用框架方法对数据进行主题分析。
在常规牙科实践中很少对 ST 用户进行筛查,提供的戒烟支持也只是简短的建议。牙医识别出的障碍包括:害怕冒犯和对患者进行刻板印象;缺乏知识和技能;缺乏隐私;缺乏对行为支持有效性的信任;缺乏时间和工作负荷压力;牙医中 ST 的使用;缺乏转介系统;以及提供 ST 戒烟支持的强制性要求缺失。促进因素包括:通过初级牙医提供支持和牙医与患者之间的互动时间长度。鼻烟是牙科患者最常使用的 ST 产品。患者报告从任何医疗保健提供者那里获得的戒烟支持微不足道。
确定了影响牙科医院实施 ST 戒烟支持的一系列因素。这些发现可以为在低中等收入国家的牙科和其他临床环境中实施 ST 戒烟的行为干预提供信息。
与可燃烟草的控制相比,无烟烟草的控制明显滞后。这是第一项在巴基斯坦定性探讨牙科环境中 ST 戒烟支持实施情况的研究。该研究利用“能力-机会-动机-行为”模型,深入了解牙医在常规牙科实践中实施有效行为干预措施以提供 ST 戒烟支持的能力不足。该研究强调了患者对戒烟支持的需求和接受程度与牙医对患者接受戒烟支持的担忧之间存在显著差异,因此需要有效的实施策略来优化资源匮乏环境中以牙医为主导的烟草戒烟干预措施。