Suppr超能文献

术中超声引导与传统腹腔镜肾切除术的随机对照试验。

Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)-guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, India.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2024 Jan;133(1):71-78. doi: 10.1111/bju.16136. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of routine use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing IOUS-guided laparoscopic nephrectomy (IOUS-LN) and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy (C-LN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a parallel-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial (CTRI/2021/12/038906). All patients undergoing LN, either for benign or malignant causes, were included. Patients undergoing partial/cytoreductive nephrectomy, with venous thrombus were excluded. In the study arm, IOUS-guided renal vascular assessment was performed after colon mobilisation and a standard LN was performed in the control arm. The primary outcome was intraoperative duration. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for open conversion, blood transfusion, perioperative complications, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and length of hospitalisation (LOH). The patients were followed for 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were included, with 52 in each arm. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both arms. A significant reduction in the operative duration (mean [sd] 181.69 [40.8] vs 199.7 [41.8] min, P = 0.02) was seen in the IOUS-LN group. The difference in blood loss showed no significant difference when compared between both groups (median [interquartile range] 84.55 [74-105.5] vs 99.95 [78.5-111] mL, P = 0.08). On subgroup analysis, the reduction in the operative duration was significant in patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN; mean [sd] 194.4 [42.5] vs 221.2 [36.4] min, P = 0.01), whereas comparable operative durations were seen in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN; mean [sd] 168.96 [35.3] vs 178.3 [35.9] min, P = 0.34). Similar conversion rates were seen in both groups (P = 0.98) along with blood transfusions (P = 0.78). The LOH, ICU stay, and complications were similar in both groups. Significantly less blood loss (P = 0.03) was noted with IOUS in patients undergoing LSN. IOUS did not influence any outcomes in patients undergoing LRN.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative ultrasonography significantly reduced the operative duration in LN, but with no significant reduction in the volume of blood loss. Significant reduction in intraoperative duration and blood loss was seen in patients who underwent LSN on subgroup analysis.

摘要

目的

评估术中超声(IOUS)常规应用于指导 IOUS 引导下腹腔镜肾切除术(IOUS-LN)和传统腹腔镜肾切除术(C-LN)的围手术期结局的疗效。

患者和方法

这是一项平行臂、单盲、随机对照试验(CTRI/2021/12/038906)。所有接受 LN 治疗的患者,无论病因是良性还是恶性,均被纳入研究。接受部分/减瘤性肾切除术且伴有静脉血栓的患者被排除在外。在研究组中,在结肠游离后进行 IOUS 引导的肾血管评估,而在对照组中进行标准 LN。主要结局是手术期间的持续时间。次要结局包括失血量、需要转为开放手术、输血、围手术期并发症、重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间和住院时间(LOH)。患者在手术后随访 3 个月。

结果

共纳入 104 例患者,每组 52 例。两组的人口统计学特征相似。在 IOUS-LN 组中,手术时间显著缩短(平均[标准差]181.69[40.8]与 199.7[41.8]分钟,P=0.02)。两组间的失血量差异无统计学意义(中位数[四分位数范围]84.55[74-105.5]与 99.95[78.5-111]毫升,P=0.08)。亚组分析显示,在接受腹腔镜单纯肾切除术(LSN)的患者中,手术时间的缩短具有显著意义(平均[标准差]194.4[42.5]与 221.2[36.4]分钟,P=0.01),而在接受腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(LRN)的患者中,手术时间相似(平均[标准差]168.96[35.3]与 178.3[35.9]分钟,P=0.34)。两组的转换率相似(P=0.98),输血情况也相似(P=0.78)。两组的 LOH、ICU 停留时间和并发症相似。在接受 LSN 的患者中,IOUS 组显著减少了出血量(P=0.03)。IOUS 对接受 LRN 的患者的任何结局均无影响。

结论

术中超声显著缩短了 LN 的手术时间,但失血量无显著减少。亚组分析显示,在接受 LSN 的患者中,手术时间和失血量均显著减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验