Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2450, USA.
Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
Water Res. 2023 Sep 1;243:120352. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120352. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
Thirty-two short term (∼7.5 h) abiotic experiments were conducted with new ductile iron and copper coupons exposed to various water qualities, including pH (7 or 9), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC, 10 or 50 mg C L) and phosphate (0 or 3 mg P L) concentrations and 4 mg Cl L free chlorine or monochloramine. To quantify oxidant reactivity with the new metal coupons, microelectrodes were used to obtain oxidant (free chlorine or monochloramine and dissolved oxygen (DO)) concentration and pH microprofiles from the bulk water to near the metal coupon surface. From the microprofiles, apparent surface reaction rate constants (k) were determined for each oxidant. An ANOVA analysis evaluated if the five variables (Material, Oxidant, Phosphate, DIC, and pH) significantly affected estimates of k, finding that the Material and Oxidant variables and their interaction were statistically significant (p<0.05), but the effect of variables of Phosphate, DIC, and pH on k values were not significant in this study. In general, both ductile iron and copper coupons showed significant surface reactivity towards free chlorine and monochloramine. For ductile iron, DO consumption was greater than for copper, which showed minimal DO reactivity, and DO was less reactive towards the copper surface than either free chlorine or monochloramine. Furthermore, pH microprofiles provided insight into the complexity that might exist near corroding metal surfaces where the bulk water pH may be substantially different from that measured near metal surfaces which is significant as pH is a controlling variable in terms of scale formation and metal solubility. This study represents an important first step towards using microelectrodes to (1) understand and provide direct measurement of oxidant microprofiles from the bulk water to the metal surface; (2) determine pipe wall reactivity using the directly measured concentrations profiles versus estimated pipe wall reactivity from bulk water measurements, and (3) understand how variables measured by bulk water samples (e.g., pH) may be drastically different from what is occurring at and near the metal surface. Together, these insights will assist in understanding disinfectant residual maintenance, corrosion, and metal release.
进行了 32 项短期(约 7.5 h)非生物实验,使用新的球墨铸铁和铜片暴露于各种水质中,包括 pH 值(7 或 9)、溶解无机碳(DIC,10 或 50 mg C L)和磷酸盐(0 或 3 mg P L)浓度和 4 mg Cl L 游离氯或一氯胺。为了量化新金属片与氧化剂的反应活性,使用微电极从主体水到接近金属片表面获得氧化剂(游离氯或一氯胺和溶解氧(DO))浓度和 pH 值微剖面。从微剖面中,确定了每种氧化剂的表观表面反应速率常数(k)。方差分析评估了五个变量(材料、氧化剂、磷酸盐、DIC 和 pH)是否显著影响 k 的估计值,发现材料和氧化剂变量及其相互作用具有统计学意义(p<0.05),但磷酸盐、DIC 和 pH 值对 k 值的影响在本研究中并不显著。一般来说,球墨铸铁和铜片对游离氯和一氯胺都表现出显著的表面反应性。对于球墨铸铁,DO 的消耗大于铜,铜对 DO 的反应性最小,并且 DO 对铜表面的反应性小于游离氯或一氯胺。此外,pH 值微剖面提供了有关在腐蚀金属表面附近可能存在的复杂性的见解,其中主体水的 pH 值可能与测量的金属表面附近的 pH 值有很大不同,这很重要,因为 pH 值是控制变量在结垢和金属溶解度方面。这项研究代表了使用微电极的重要的第一步,(1)了解并提供从主体水到金属表面的氧化剂微剖面的直接测量;(2)使用直接测量的浓度剖面确定管壁反应性,而不是从主体水测量估计管壁反应性,以及(3)了解通过主体水样测量的变量(例如,pH 值)可能与金属表面及其附近发生的情况有很大不同。这些见解将有助于理解消毒剂残留的维持、腐蚀和金属释放。