Riley Paige, Eisenhart Linda, Stephens Joseph C, Abonamah Jocelyn V, Ryman Colbey, Eckenrode Brian A
Visiting Scientist Program, Research and Support Unit, Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory Division, Quantico, Virginia, USA.
Questioned Documents Unit, FBI Laboratory Division, Quantico, Virginia, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2023 Sep;68(5):1816-1824. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15339. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
In the past, pattern disciplines within forensic science have periodically faced criticism due to their subjective and qualitative nature and the perceived absence of research evaluating and supporting the foundations of their practices. Recently, however, forensic scientists and researchers in the field of pattern evidence analysis have developed and published approaches that are more quantitative, objective, and data driven. This effort includes automation, algorithms, and measurement sciences, with the end goal of enabling conclusions to be informed by quantitative models. Before employing these tools, forensic evidence must be digitized in a way that adequately balances high-quality detail and content capture with minimal background noise imparted by the selected technique. While the current work describes the process of optimizing a method to digitize physical documentary evidence for use in semi-automated trash mark examinations, it could be applied to assist other disciplines where the digitization of physical items of evidence is prevalent. For trash mark examinations specifically, it was found that high-resolution photography provided optimal digital versions of evidentiary items when compared to high-resolution scanning.
过去,法医学中的模式学科因其主观性和定性性质,以及人们认为缺乏评估和支持其实践基础的研究,而不时受到批评。然而,最近,模式证据分析领域的法医科学家和研究人员已经开发并发表了更具定量性、客观性和数据驱动性的方法。这项工作包括自动化、算法和测量科学,最终目标是使结论能够由定量模型提供依据。在使用这些工具之前,法医证据必须以一种方式进行数字化,即在高质量细节和内容捕捉与所选技术产生的最小背景噪声之间实现充分平衡。虽然当前的工作描述了优化一种方法以将实物文件证据数字化用于半自动垃圾标记检查的过程,但它也可应用于协助其他实物证据数字化普遍存在的学科。具体对于垃圾标记检查而言,研究发现,与高分辨率扫描相比,高分辨率摄影能提供最佳的证据物品数字版本。