Xie Jiangmiao, Zhang Wenchao, Yang Elan, Yu Nanze, Xia Zenan, Liu Xiaoli, Xie Yaning, Chen Sichao, Zeng Ang
Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyuan 1#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Apr;48(7):1487-1499. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03510-z. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
BACKGROUND: Due to several factors that affect photograph quality, bias is inevitably present in two-dimensional (2D) breast photography. The principal variables affecting image performance at a fixed focus length are the distance between the camera and the subjects and the photography angles. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of camera-to-subject distances and camera height on breast measurement parameters to understand the trend of breast deformation and provide guidance for the accurate evaluation of planar follow-up. METHODS: We enlisted 16 volunteers with various breast cup sizes (A-D). Frontal and lateral photos were obtained with a steady focus of 50 mm at distances between 1.10 m and 2.20 m and at heights between 30 cm above the nipple and 30 cm below the nipple at intervals of 10 cm. Two researchers independently evaluated each volunteer's breast aesthetic parameters, including 11 linear parameters, 3 area parameters, and 3 ratio parameters, using Vernier calipers and Photoshop. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient of the two investigators ranged from 0.922 to 0.999. The results measured by Photoshop were 29.67 ± 5.23% greater than those of the Vernier caliper (p < 0.01). In contrast to ratio parameters, which showed no significant changes in each distance group (p = 1.00), linear parameters and area parameters significantly increased as object distance decreased (p < 0.05). The lower pole of the breast grew wider and flatter and occupied a larger proportion of the breast as height declined. CONCLUSION: Camera-to-subject distances of 1.5-1.7 m are recommended for stabilized and uniform breast photography. Varying shooting height affects breast distortion. Quantifying the relationship between photographic conditions and breast morphology enables plastic surgeons to conduct more comprehensive and accurate assessments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Bullet point list: 1. The breast morphology will get more distortion with a smaller camera-to-subject distance. 2. Camera-to-subject distances of 1.5~1.7m are recommended for stabilized and uniform breast photography. 3. Height rather than distance affects the breast proportion.
背景:由于多种因素会影响照片质量,二维乳腺摄影中不可避免地存在偏差。在固定焦距下影响图像质量的主要变量是相机与拍摄对象之间的距离以及拍摄角度。 目的:本研究旨在探究相机与拍摄对象之间的距离和相机高度对乳房测量参数的影响,以了解乳房变形趋势,并为平面随访的准确评估提供指导。 方法:我们招募了16名不同罩杯尺寸(A - D)的志愿者。在50毫米的固定焦距下,于1.10米至2.20米的距离以及乳头上方30厘米至乳头下方30厘米的高度,每隔10厘米拍摄正面和侧面照片。两名研究人员使用游标卡尺和Photoshop软件独立评估每位志愿者的乳房美学参数,包括11个线性参数、3个面积参数和3个比例参数。 结果:两名研究人员的相关系数在0.922至0.999之间。Photoshop测量的结果比游标卡尺测量的结果大29.67±5.23%(p < 0.01)。与比例参数不同,比例参数在每个距离组中均无显著变化(p = 1.00),线性参数和面积参数随着物距减小而显著增加(p < 0.05)。随着高度下降,乳房下极变得更宽更平,在乳房中所占比例更大。 结论:建议相机与拍摄对象之间的距离为1.5 - 1.7米,以获得稳定且均匀的乳房摄影效果。不同的拍摄高度会影响乳房变形。量化摄影条件与乳房形态之间的关系可使整形外科医生进行更全面、准确的评估。 证据级别IV:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00,266。要点列表:1. 相机与拍摄对象之间的距离越小,乳房形态的变形越大。2. 建议相机与拍摄对象之间的距离为1.5~1.7米,以获得稳定且均匀的乳房摄影效果。3. 影响乳房比例的是高度而非距离。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-4
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015-6
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-10
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021-12
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020-9-21
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020-10
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018-10
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018-7-1
PLoS One. 2016-2-19
J Vis. 2012-5-25