Suppr超能文献

一种用于检测肘关节后外侧旋转不稳的简单通用测试方法。

A Simple and Versatile Test for Elbow Posterolateral Rotatory Instability.

作者信息

Goldin Amanda N, Dwight Kathryn D, Hentzen Eric R, Leek Bryan T, Hughes-Austin Jan M, Ward Samuel R, Abrams Reid A

机构信息

University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2025 Jan;20(1):37-42. doi: 10.1177/15589447231185585. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) results from lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LCL) deficiency. The lateral pivot shift test is used to diagnose PLRI but can be difficult to perform and is poorly tolerated. We present a new maneuver, the Posterior Radiocapitellar Subluxation Test (PRST), that we believe is easier to perform. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and reproducibility of the PRST with the lateral pivot shift test.

METHODS

We obtained 10 cadaveric upper extremity specimens, performed a Kocher approach on each, released the LCL origin in 5, then closed. The specimens were randomized, and 3 attending orthopedic surgeons and 1 resident blindly performed the PRST then the lateral pivot shift test after re-randomization and assessed presence or absence of PLRI. This process was repeated the following day. The data for each test were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

For the blinded testing when comparing PRST with the pivot shift test, overall accuracy was 77.5%, compared with 67.5% ( = .03), sensitivity was 75.0%, compared with 50.0% ( = .003), and specificity was 80.0%, compared with 85.0% ( = .55). The PRST appears to be at least as accurate as the lateral pivot shift test, with comparable intraobserver and interobserver reliability.

摘要

背景

后外侧旋转不稳定(PLRI)由尺侧副韧带(LCL)损伤引起。外侧轴移试验用于诊断PLRI,但操作困难且患者耐受性差。我们提出一种新的手法,即桡骨头后脱位试验(PRST),我们认为该试验更易于操作。本研究的目的是比较PRST与外侧轴移试验的有效性和可重复性。

方法

我们获取了10个尸体上肢标本,对每个标本采用Kocher入路,在5个标本中松解LCL起点,然后闭合创口。将标本随机分组,3名骨科主治医师和1名住院医师在重新随机分组后先盲目进行PRST,然后进行外侧轴移试验,并评估是否存在PLRI。次日重复该过程。分析每个试验数据的敏感性、特异性和准确性。

结果

在将PRST与轴移试验进行比较的盲法测试中,总体准确率为77.5%,而轴移试验为67.5%(P = 0.03);敏感性为75.0%,而轴移试验为50.0%(P = 0.003);特异性为80.0%,而轴移试验为85.0%(P = 0.55)。PRST似乎至少与外侧轴移试验一样准确,观察者内和观察者间的可靠性相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c9b/11653289/44fb17da3eab/10.1177_15589447231185585-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验