• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以“重要事项”指导出院后康复:在退伍军人事务部社区生活中心实施患者优先事项识别

Guiding Post-Hospital Recovery by 'What Matters:' Implementation of Patient Priorities Identification in a VA Community Living Center.

作者信息

Ritchey Katherine C, Solberg Laurence M, Citty Sandra Wolfe, Kiefer Lea, Martinez Erica, Gray Caroline, Naik Aanand D

机构信息

Puget Sound Veterans Health Care System, Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center (GRECC), Tacoma, WA 98498, USA.

Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jul 4;8(4):74. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8040074.

DOI:10.3390/geriatrics8040074
PMID:37489322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10366719/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient priorities care (PPC) is an effective age-friendly health systems (AFHS) approach to aligning care with goals derived from 'what matters'. The purpose of this quality improvement program was to evaluate the fidelity and feasibility of the health priorities identification (HPI) process in VA Community Living Centers (CLC).

METHODS

PPC experts worked with local CLC staff to guide the integration of HPI into the CLC and utilized a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model for this quality improvement project. PPC experts reviewed health priorities identification (HPI) encounters and interdisciplinary team (IDT) meetings for fidelity to the HPI process of PPC. Qualitative interviews with local CLC staff determined the appropriateness of the health priorities identification process in the CLC.

RESULTS

Over 8 months, nine facilitators completed twenty HPI encounters. Development of a Patient Health Priorities note template, staff education and PPC facilitator training improved fidelity and documentation of HPI encounters in the electronic health record. Facilitator interviews suggested that PPC is appropriate in this setting, not burdensome to staff and fostered a person-centered approach to AFHS.

CONCLUSIONS

The HPI process is an acceptable and feasible approach to ask the 'what matters' component of AFHS in a CLC setting.

摘要

背景

患者优先护理(PPC)是一种有效的关爱老年人的卫生系统(AFHS)方法,可使护理与源自“重要事项”的目标保持一致。本质量改进项目的目的是评估退伍军人事务部社区生活中心(CLC)中健康优先事项识别(HPI)流程的保真度和可行性。

方法

PPC专家与当地CLC工作人员合作,指导将HPI整合到CLC中,并在这个质量改进项目中采用了计划-实施-研究-改进(PDSA)模型。PPC专家审查了健康优先事项识别(HPI)会诊和跨学科团队(IDT)会议,以确保对PPC的HPI流程的保真度。对当地CLC工作人员进行的定性访谈确定了CLC中健康优先事项识别流程的适当性。

结果

在8个月的时间里,9名协调员完成了20次HPI会诊。患者健康优先事项记录模板的开发、工作人员教育和PPC协调员培训提高了电子健康记录中HPI会诊的保真度和记录。协调员访谈表明,PPC在这种情况下是合适的,对工作人员来说并不繁重,并促进了以患者为中心的AFHS方法。

结论

HPI流程是在CLC环境中询问AFHS的“重要事项”组成部分的一种可接受且可行的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fd/10366719/a0d0f515f75f/geriatrics-08-00074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fd/10366719/a0d0f515f75f/geriatrics-08-00074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fd/10366719/a0d0f515f75f/geriatrics-08-00074-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Guiding Post-Hospital Recovery by 'What Matters:' Implementation of Patient Priorities Identification in a VA Community Living Center.以“重要事项”指导出院后康复:在退伍军人事务部社区生活中心实施患者优先事项识别
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jul 4;8(4):74. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8040074.
2
Feasibility of Implementing Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions.实施老年多病共存患者优先护理的可行性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):2009-2016. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15465. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
3
Feasibility of Clinicians Aligning Health Care with Patient Priorities in Geriatrics Ambulatory Care.临床医生在老年科门诊医疗中使医疗保健与患者优先事项保持一致的可行性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):2112-2116. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16662. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
Implementation outcomes of evidence-based quality improvement for depression in VA community based outpatient clinics.基于证据的抑郁症质量改进在退伍军人事务部社区门诊中的实施结果。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 11;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-30.
5
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
6
Development of a Clinically Feasible Process for Identifying Individual Health Priorities.制定一种具有临床可行性的个体健康优先级识别流程。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):1872-1879. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15437. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Identifying Factors Affecting the Sustainability of the STAR-VA Program in the Veterans Health Administration.确定影响退伍军人健康管理局STAR-VA项目可持续性的因素。
Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):577-588. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac090.
8
9
Implementation of Patient Engagement Tools in Electronic Health Records to Enhance Patient-Centered Communication: Protocol for Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Results.在电子健康记录中实施患者参与工具以加强以患者为中心的沟通:可行性评估方案及初步结果
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 26;10(8):e30431. doi: 10.2196/30431.
10
Measuring Adoption of Patient Priorities-Aligned Care Using Natural Language Processing of Electronic Health Records: Development and Validation of the Model.利用电子健康记录的自然语言处理来衡量患者优先事项匹配护理的采用情况:模型的开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Feb 19;9(2):e18756. doi: 10.2196/18756.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of the Age-Friendly Health Systems Initiative in the Department of Veterans Affairs: 5 Years of Improving Quality for Older Veterans.美国退伍军人事务部老年友好型医疗系统倡议的实施:为老年退伍军人提升医疗质量的五年历程。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251366883. doi: 10.1177/00469580251366883. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
A Mixed-Methods Usability Pilot of a Value-Goal Elicitation Tool in the Inpatient Setting for Older Adults Anticipating Post-Acute Care.针对预期接受急性后护理的老年人,在住院环境中对价值目标引出工具进行的混合方法可用性预试验。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251332131. doi: 10.1177/00469580251332131. Epub 2025 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of the Patient-Identified Top Health Priority in Care Decision-making for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions.在患有多种慢性病的老年人的护理决策中使用患者确定的首要健康问题。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2131496. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31496.
2
Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study.实施重症护理计划后临床医生的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517.
3
Outcome Goals and Health Care Preferences of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions.
患有多种慢性病的老年人的结局目标和医疗保健偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1271.
4
Clinician Perspectives on Incorporating Patients' Values-Based Health Priorities in Decision-Making.临床医生对在决策中纳入基于患者价值观的健康优先事项的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):267-269. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16914. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Feasibility of Clinicians Aligning Health Care with Patient Priorities in Geriatrics Ambulatory Care.临床医生在老年科门诊医疗中使医疗保健与患者优先事项保持一致的可行性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):2112-2116. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16662. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.患者优先排序决策与多重慢性病老年人的患者结局及门诊医疗负担的关联:一项非随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1688-1697. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235.
7
Challenges and strategies in patients' health priorities-aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.患有多种慢性病的老年人在健康优先级方面的决策一致:挑战与策略。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0218249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218249. eCollection 2019.
8
A Preference-Based Model of Care: An Integrative Theoretical Model of the Role of Preferences in Person-Centered Care.偏好导向型照护模式:以偏好为中心的个体照护角色的综合理论模型
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):376-384. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz075.
9
Development of a Clinically Feasible Process for Identifying Individual Health Priorities.制定一种具有临床可行性的个体健康优先级识别流程。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):1872-1879. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15437. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
10
Feasibility of Implementing Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions.实施老年多病共存患者优先护理的可行性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):2009-2016. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15465. Epub 2018 Oct 3.