Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Kiko Town Council, Kabarole, Uganda.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 26;18(7):e0288115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288115. eCollection 2023.
Crop loss to wildlife, particularly elephants, threatens livelihoods and support for conservation around many protected areas in Africa and Asia. Low-cost elephant barriers have been successfully deployed in savannas but seldom tested around isolated forest parks where the stakes are high for local farmers and isolated elephant populations. We measured the effectiveness of a series of ≥3 m deep trenches dug by farmers neighboring Kibale National Park, Uganda. We monitored trench quality and crop loss to elephants weekly for a year across 47 transects in four park-adjacent communities, and conducted controlled, before-and-after comparisons of verified damage. Elephants damaged or destroyed >4 ha of crops during 48 independent foraging events, the majority <220m from the forest boundary. The frequency of damage varied significantly between and within communities. The majority of trenches were not breached by elephants but five suffered ≥4 breaches. Elephant-breached trenches and their neighboring trenches were lower quality than those not breached in the same week (Wilcoxon test: p<0.001). Trenches were also more likely to be breached where people had planted more crops favored by elephants (Wilcoxon test: p = 0.014). Thus, trench quality and the draw of palatable crops both appeared to influence elephant damage. Although trenches may deter elephants, challenges include heavy labor and difficulties of digging in rocky and swampy areas. Trenches alone will not prevent conflict but this strategy holds promise for hot-spots of conflict at forest edges. Given the stakes for farmers and biodiversity, we call for systematic assessment of crop losses and offer recommendations on monitoring and analysis. Such data will allow for stronger inference about effectiveness before investment of effort and resources in interventions.
野生动物(尤其是大象)造成的作物损失,威胁着非洲和亚洲许多保护区周边的生计和对自然保护的支持。低成本的大象围栏已在热带稀树草原成功部署,但在孤立的森林公园周边很少进行测试,而这些公园对于当地农民和孤立的大象种群来说至关重要。我们测量了乌干达基巴莱国家公园周边的农民挖掘的一系列≥3 米深的沟渠的有效性。我们每周监测沟渠的质量和大象对作物的损失情况,持续了一年,共在四个公园附近社区的 47 个横截面上进行,对经过验证的损害进行了控制、前后对比。在 48 次独立觅食事件中,大象损坏或破坏了>4 公顷的作物,其中大多数距离森林边界<220 米。不同社区和同一社区内的损害频率差异显著。大多数沟渠没有被大象破坏,但有 5 个沟渠遭受了≥4 次破坏。大象破坏的沟渠及其相邻沟渠的质量比同一周内未被破坏的沟渠差(威尔科克森检验:p<0.001)。在同一周内,人们种植了大象更喜欢的更多作物的地方,沟渠更容易被破坏(威尔科克森检验:p = 0.014)。因此,沟渠的质量和可口作物的吸引力似乎都影响了大象的破坏行为。尽管沟渠可能会阻止大象,但仍存在挑战,包括劳动强度大,以及在岩石和沼泽地区挖掘的困难。仅靠沟渠无法防止冲突,但这种策略为森林边缘的热点冲突提供了希望。考虑到农民和生物多样性的利害关系,我们呼吁系统评估作物损失,并就监测和分析提出建议。这些数据将使我们在投入精力和资源进行干预之前,能够更有力地推断干预措施的有效性。