Bermejo Lara Almudena Fernández, Esteban José Javier Jareño, Díez Javier de Miguel, Zabaleta Irene Milagros Domínguez, Hernández Carmen González, Rivas María Pilar Ochoa, Ortega Carlos Gutiérrez
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Central de la Defensa, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Pneumology, Hospital Central de la Defensa, Madrid, Spain.
Open Respir Arch. 2022 Mar 2;4(2):100170. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2022.100170. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
Current clinical guidelines do not recommend the routine use of thromboprophylaxis in cancer primary unselected patients. Identifying cancer patients who could be beneficiaries of thrombotic prophylaxis is a real challenge. We aimed to analyse the application of Khorana score in cancer patients. We also tried to evaluate the prescription of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients at risk of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED).
A retrospective observational study of survival of hospitalised patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (PE) at the Hospital Central de la Defensa from January 2009 to March 2018. They were stratified into tumour PE (TPE) and non-tumour PE (nTPE). A case-control study was also carried out by TPE patients and non PE cancer patients (nPEC).
108 patients were diagnosed with TPE, 260 nTPE and 324 nPEC. Gynaecological tumours were the most frequent (23.1%), followed by lung, digestive and urological cancer (20.4% each) in the TPE group. Death risk was 1.9 times higher in cancer patients (95% CI: 1.23-2.8) ( < 0.001). Khorana score was ≥3 points in 9.7% of TPE and 3.1% of nPEC compared to 26.2% of TPE and 9.9% of nPEC with Khorana score ≥2 points ( < 0.001). 7.4% of TPE patients received thromboprophylaxis. Khorana score in TPE patients without thromboprophylaxis was ≥3 points in the 9% and ≥2 points in the 24%.
There is an underutilisation of thromboprophylaxis in our cancer patients and mainly in those with high risk of VTED, as well as poor adherence to the Khorana score. More studies are needed to validate these findings and to optimise predictive strategies in the management of these patients.
当前临床指南不建议在未经过筛选的癌症初诊患者中常规使用血栓预防措施。识别可能从血栓预防中获益的癌症患者是一项真正的挑战。我们旨在分析科纳纳评分在癌症患者中的应用情况。我们还试图评估对有静脉血栓栓塞性疾病(VTED)风险的癌症患者进行一级血栓预防的处方情况。
对2009年1月至2018年3月在国防中央医院确诊为肺栓塞(PE)的住院患者生存情况进行回顾性观察研究。他们被分为肿瘤性肺栓塞(TPE)和非肿瘤性肺栓塞(nTPE)。还对TPE患者和非PE癌症患者(nPEC)进行了病例对照研究。
108例患者被诊断为TPE,260例为nTPE,324例为nPEC。妇科肿瘤最为常见(23.1%),其次是TPE组中的肺癌、消化系统癌和泌尿系统癌(各占20.4%)。癌症患者的死亡风险高1.9倍(95%置信区间:1.23 - 2.8)(P < 0.001)。科纳纳评分≥3分的患者在TPE组中占9.7%,在nPEC组中占3.1%;而科纳纳评分≥2分的患者在TPE组中占26.2%,在nPEC组中占9.9%(P < 0.001)。7.4%的TPE患者接受了血栓预防。未接受血栓预防的TPE患者中科纳纳评分≥3分的占9%,≥2分的占24%。
我们的癌症患者中血栓预防措施未得到充分利用,主要是在那些VTED高风险患者中,并且对科纳纳评分的依从性较差。需要更多研究来验证这些发现并优化这些患者管理中的预测策略。