Tachi Rintaro, Fuga Michiyasu, Tanaka Toshihide, Teshigawara Akihiko, Kajiwara Ikki, Irie Koreaki, Ishibashi Toshihiro, Hasegawa Yuzuru, Murayama Yuichi
Department of Neurosurgery, Jikei University School of Medicine Kashiwa Hospital, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kohnodai Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2022;16(8):387-394. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2021-0089. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
Long-term clinical outcomes including delayed rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) after coil embolization (CE) remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the precise timing of re-treatment for recanalized UIAs before rupture.
From February 2012 to June 2020, a total of 197 patients with 207 UIAs underwent CE in our institution and were followed up for more than 6 months. The follow-up period, as well as morphological changes from treatment to recanalization, regrowth, and rupture, was retrospectively analyzed. Delayed rupture was defined as a rupture that occurred more than 1 month after CE.
The average length of follow-up was 48.7 months. Three of 207 UIAs (1.45%) ruptured after CE. The aneurysm locations were the middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior communicating artery (AcomA), and internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery (ICA-Pcomm). The annual rupture rate after CE was 0.36%. Immediately after the first CE, treated aneurysms were graded according to the Modified Raymond-Roy Classification with class II for MCA aneurysms and class IIIb for AcomA and ICA-Pcomm aneurysms. The ICA-Pcomm aneurysm was treated with two additional CEs and was finally graded as class I. In all cases, DSA or MRA before aneurysm rupture showed recanalization and regrowth of aneurysms. The average periods from final embolization to regrowth and from regrowth to rupture were 54.3 months (±16.8) and 2.3 months (±0.9), respectively.
UIAs with recanalization and regrowth after CE should undergo re-treatment as early as possible.
包括未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)在弹簧圈栓塞(CE)后延迟破裂在内的长期临床结局仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估再通的未破裂颅内动脉瘤在破裂前再次治疗的精确时机。
2012年2月至2020年6月,共有197例患有207个未破裂颅内动脉瘤的患者在我院接受了弹簧圈栓塞治疗,并进行了超过6个月的随访。对随访期以及从治疗到再通、再生长和破裂的形态学变化进行了回顾性分析。延迟破裂定义为在弹簧圈栓塞后1个月以上发生的破裂。
平均随访时间为48.7个月。207个未破裂颅内动脉瘤中有3个(1.45%)在弹簧圈栓塞后破裂。动脉瘤位置分别为大脑中动脉(MCA)、前交通动脉(AcomA)和颈内动脉-后交通动脉(ICA-Pcomm)。弹簧圈栓塞后的年破裂率为0.36%。首次弹簧圈栓塞后,根据改良Raymond-Roy分类对治疗的动脉瘤进行分级,大脑中动脉动脉瘤为Ⅱ级,前交通动脉和颈内动脉-后交通动脉动脉瘤为Ⅲb级。颈内动脉-后交通动脉动脉瘤又进行了两次弹簧圈栓塞治疗,最终分级为Ⅰ级。在所有病例中,动脉瘤破裂前的数字减影血管造影(DSA)或磁共振血管造影(MRA)显示动脉瘤再通和再生长。从最终栓塞到再生长以及从再生长到破裂的平均时间分别为54.3个月(±16.8)和2.3个月(±0.9)。
弹簧圈栓塞后出现再通和再生长的未破裂颅内动脉瘤应尽早进行再次治疗。