COPD 患者多疾病加重行动计划依从性的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。

Facilitators and Barriers of Adherence to Multi-Disease Exacerbation Action Plans in COPD Patients - A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Section Cognition, Data and Education, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

出版信息

COPD. 2023 Dec;20(1):262-273. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2023.2240408.

Abstract

Whereas exacerbation action plans to self-manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) significantly improve health outcomes, patients' adherence to those action plans is often poor. This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers of adherence to tailored multi-disease exacerbation action plans. We also explored patients' perspectives toward disease management roles. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of COPD patients who completed a Dutch-Australian self-management intervention evaluating tailored exacerbation action plans for COPD and relevant comorbidities. Interviews were thematically analyzed using a deductive approach guided by the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation of Behavior (COM-B) model. In 2016, ten patients (5 Australian; 5 Dutch; 6 men; age 59-83 years) were interviewed at the end of their one-year follow-up. Facilitators of adherence included improved patients' comprehension of disease and treatment, positive feelings about the intervention, improved self-confidence, and professional support. Barriers included difficulties to recognize symptoms, dislike toward daily symptom monitoring, negative feelings about the intervention, negative mood state, and complexity of symptom diaries and action plans. Patients indicated three distinctive perspectives of their own and their healthcare professional's role in their disease management: 1) patients felt mainly responsible; 2) patients felt shared responsibility with their healthcare professional; and 3) patients felt not responsible as they perceived their healthcare professional to be mainly responsible. We successfully used the COM-B model as a guide to identify facilitators and barriers of patients' adherence to multi-disease exacerbation action plans. Improving patients' adherence in future self-management interventions by targeting specific facilitators or barriers should be considered.

摘要

虽然针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD) 的恶化行动计划可显著改善健康结果,但患者对这些行动计划的依从性往往很差。本研究旨在确定 COPD 个体化多病种恶化行动计划依从性的促进因素和障碍因素。我们还探讨了患者对疾病管理角色的看法。对参与一项评估 COPD 及相关合并症个体化恶化行动计划的荷兰-澳大利亚自我管理干预研究的患者进行了抽样,采用个体半结构式访谈方法。根据行为能力、机会和动机(COM-B)模型,采用演绎方法对访谈进行主题分析。2016 年,在为期一年的随访结束时,对 10 名患者(5 名澳大利亚人;5 名荷兰人;6 名男性;年龄 59-83 岁)进行了访谈。依从性的促进因素包括提高患者对疾病和治疗的理解、对干预的积极感受、增强的自信心和专业支持。障碍因素包括难以识别症状、不喜欢每日症状监测、对干预的负面感受、负面情绪状态、症状日记和行动计划的复杂性。患者表示对自己和医疗保健专业人员在疾病管理中的角色有三种不同的看法:1)患者主要感到有责任;2)患者感到与医疗保健专业人员共同承担责任;3)患者感到没有责任,因为他们认为医疗保健专业人员主要负责。我们成功地使用 COM-B 模型作为指导,确定了患者对多病种恶化行动计划依从性的促进因素和障碍因素。在未来的自我管理干预中,通过针对特定的促进因素或障碍因素来提高患者的依从性,应予以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索