Suppr超能文献

HIV 感染者对荷兰注射和口服抗逆转录病毒治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Preferences of people living with HIV for injectable and oral antiretroviral treatment in the Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

GSK, Amersfoort, Netherlands.

出版信息

AIDS Care. 2024 Apr;36(4):536-545. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2023.2240067. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

Abstract

Injectable antiretroviral treatment (ART) represents a new effective and potentially more convenient alternative to oral ART for people living with HIV (PLWH). This study assessed preferences of PLWH for long-acting injectable compared with oral ART in the Netherlands. A labelled discrete choice experiment presented 12 choice sets of long-acting injectable and oral ART. PLWH were asked to select their preferred ART, described by six attributes: location of administration, dosing frequency, risk of short-term side effects, drug-drug interaction, forgivability, and food and mealtime restrictions. Random parameters logit and latent class models were used to estimate preferences of PLWH. 98.6% of 76 respondents were experienced oral ART users that had taken ART for a median of 12 years (Q1-Q3: 7.0-20.0). 30 (39.5%) respondents chose long-acting injectable ART in all choice tasks and 22 (28.9%) always chose oral ART. The random parameter model showed that, on average, respondents significantly favoured long-acting injectable ART over oral ART, preferred administration of the long-acting injectable ART at home, and a less frequent regimen. The latent class model confirmed one class strongly preferring long-acting injectable ART and one class slightly preferring oral ART. This study highlights the value for both long-acting injectable and oral ART.

摘要

注射用抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)为 HIV 感染者(PLWH)提供了一种新的有效且潜在更方便的口服 ART 替代方案。本研究评估了荷兰 PLWH 对长效注射用和口服 ART 的偏好。一项贴标签的离散选择实验呈现了 12 个长效注射用和口服 ART 的选择集。PLWH 被要求选择他们更喜欢的 ART,由六个属性描述:给药部位、给药频率、短期副作用风险、药物相互作用、宽容性和食物和用餐时间限制。随机参数对数和潜在类别模型用于估计 PLWH 的偏好。76 名受访者中的 98.6%是有经验的口服 ART 用户,他们服用 ART 的中位数为 12 年(Q1-Q3:7.0-20.0)。30 名(39.5%)受访者在所有选择任务中都选择了长效注射用 ART,22 名(28.9%)始终选择了口服 ART。随机参数模型显示,平均而言,受访者明显更喜欢长效注射用 ART 而不是口服 ART,更喜欢在家中进行长效注射用 ART 给药,并且更喜欢更频繁的方案。潜在类别模型证实了一类人强烈偏好长效注射用 ART,另一类人稍微偏好口服 ART。本研究强调了长效注射用和口服 ART 的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验