Suppr超能文献

症状性成年人间歇性心室预激:总是低风险的标志吗?

Intermittent ventricular pre-excitation in symptomatic adults: Always a marker of low risk?

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Cardiology Unit, "L. Bonomo" Hospital, Andria, Italy.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1049-1055. doi: 10.1111/pace.14798. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intermittent ventricular pre-excitation was considered a low-risk marker for sudden death. However, to date, some studies do not exclude the existence of accessory pathways (APs) with high-risk intermittent antegrade conductive properties. According to current European Guidelines, high-risk features of APs are antegrade pathway conduction ≤250 ms in baseline or during the adrenergic stimulus, inducibility of atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardias (AVRT), inducibility of pre-excited atrial fibrillation (AF), and presence of multiple APs. For all of these transcatheter ablation is recommended. The aim of our study was to evaluate the existence of differences in risk characteristics between patients with intermittent pre-excitation (IPX) and those with persistent pre-excitation (PPX), from a sample of adults with ventricular pre-excitation and symptoms like palpitations.

METHODS

293 adults [IPX: 51 (17.4%); PPX: 242 (82.6%)] underwent electrophysiological study and then catheter ablation of their APs if arrhythmia inducibility (AVRT/AF) was noted, or, conversely, if it was appreciated a fast AP antegrade conduction, in baseline or during intravenous isoproterenol infusion, or if multiple APs were detected.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics (age and gender), AVRT/AF inducibility, antegrade conductive properties, the prevalence of multiple APs, and APs locations between IPX and PPX patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, patients with IPX did not show significant differences in clinical and electrophysiological features versus PPX patients.

摘要

背景

间歇性心室预激曾被认为是猝死的低危标志物。然而,迄今为止,一些研究并未排除具有高危间歇性顺向传导特性的旁路(AP)的存在。根据目前的欧洲指南,AP 的高危特征包括:在基线或肾上腺素刺激期间,前向通路传导≤250ms;可诱发房室折返性心动过速(AVRT);可诱发预激性心房颤动(AF);存在多个 AP。所有这些都推荐进行经导管消融。我们的研究目的是评估在间歇性预激(IPX)和持续性预激(PPX)患者之间,存在于有室性预激和心悸等症状的成年患者中,风险特征是否存在差异。

方法

293 例成年人[IPX:51 例(17.4%);PPX:242 例(82.6%)]接受电生理研究,如果发现心律失常可诱发性(AVRT/AF),或如果在静注异丙肾上腺素输注期间或如果检测到多个 AP 时,AP 前向传导速度较快(AP 前向传导速度快基线或),则对其 AP 进行导管消融。

结果

IPX 和 PPX 患者在人口统计学特征(年龄和性别)、AVRT/AF 可诱发性、前向传导特性、多 AP 发生率和 AP 位置方面均无统计学差异。

结论

在我们的研究中,与 PPX 患者相比,IPX 患者的临床和电生理特征没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验