• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Two Types of Patient Specific Implants (PSI) and Quad Zygoma Implant (QZI) for Rehabilitation of Post-COVID Maxillary Mucormycosis Defect (PCMMD): Finite Element Analysis.两种定制式种植体(PSI)和颧四种植体(QZI)用于新冠后上颌毛霉菌病缺损(PCMMD)修复的比较:有限元分析
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Sep;22(3):688-694. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01950-3. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
2
A 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of patient-specific implant (with strut abutments) interface on stress concentration on the implant and surrounding bone in bilateral maxillary deformities.针对双侧上颌骨畸形患者定制种植体(带支柱式基台)界面在种植体及周围骨组织应力集中情况的三维有限元分析
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 May-Aug;15(2):268-272. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_155_23. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.三种植体和四种植体支持的下颌骨螺旋固位修复体的生物力学:一项三维有限元分析研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):68.e1-68.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Topology optimization of a mandibular reconstruction plate and biomechanical validation.下颌骨重建钢板的拓扑优化及生物力学验证
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jan;113:104157. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104157. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
5
Finite element analysis of patient-specific TMJ implants to replace bilateral joints with simultaneous correction of facial deformity.针对特定患者的颞下颌关节植入物进行有限元分析,以同时矫正面部畸形的方式替换双侧关节。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):674-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.通过三维有限元分析比较All-on-4治疗理念中不同种植体倾斜度和悬臂长度的生物力学特性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):64-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6201.
7
Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis.不同倾斜角度的全口种植体和颧骨种植体周围的应力分布比较:7 模型有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03761-x.
8
Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.基于三维有限元分析的种植体支持的单冠中不同种植体-基台连接、固位系统和修复材料的生物力学评价。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Jun 1;48(3):194-201. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00328.
9
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.上颌前部区域不同连接方式、长度和直径种植体生物力学行为的三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):101-10. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4120. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
10
Designing Novel Endodontic Implants and Evaluation of the Stress Distribution in Maxillary Anteriors Using Finite Element Analysis.设计新型牙髓植入物并使用有限元分析评估上颌前牙区的应力分布
Cureus. 2024 Jun 17;16(6):e62562. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62562. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical validation of structural optimized patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate orienting additive manufacturing.结构优化的个体化下颌骨重建板定向增材制造的生物力学验证。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Sep;224:107023. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107023. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
The rising challenge of mucormycosis for maxillofacial prosthodontists in the Covid-19 pandemic: A literature review.新冠疫情期间,颌面赝复学医生面临的毛霉病挑战日益严峻:文献综述
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jul 30;66(3):395-401. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00264. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
Improvement of an additively manufactured subperiosteal implant structure design by finite elements based topological optimization.基于有限元的拓扑优化改进增材制造的骨膜下植入物结构设计
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 28;11(1):15390. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94980-1.
4
An implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a bilateral subtotal maxillectomy defect secondary to rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis: A clinical report of a graftless approach.患者因鼻眶脑毛霉菌病导致双侧上颌骨次全切除缺损,通过植入物支持的修复体进行修复:无移植物方法的临床报告。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jul;128(1):101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
The use of 3D virtual surgical planning and computer aided design in reconstruction of maxillary surgical defects.3D虚拟手术规划和计算机辅助设计在上颌骨手术缺损重建中的应用。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr;28(2):122-128. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000618.
6
Occlusal load modelling significantly impacts the predicted tooth stress response during biting: a simulation study.咬合负荷建模对咬合过程中预测的牙齿应力反应有显著影响:一项模拟研究。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 May;23(7):261-270. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1711886. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Effects of Different Positions and Angles of Implants in Maxillary Edentulous Jaw on Surrounding Bone Stress under Dynamic Loading: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.上颌无牙颌种植体不同位置和角度对动态加载下周围骨应力的影响:三维有限元分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2019 Dec 17;2019:8074096. doi: 10.1155/2019/8074096. eCollection 2019.
8
Load-carrying capacity of short implants in edentulous posterior maxilla: A finite element study.无牙颌上颌后牙区短种植体的承载能力:一项有限元研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Sep;71:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
Obturator fabrication incorporating computer-aided design and 3-dimensional printing technology: A clinical report.采用计算机辅助设计和三维打印技术制作闭孔器:临床报告。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):694-697. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.019. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
10
Single-Unit 3D-Printed Titanium Reconstruction Plate for Maxillary Reconstruction: The Evolution of Surgical Reconstruction for Maxillary Defects-A Case Report and Review of Current Techniques.用于上颌骨重建的单单元3D打印钛重建板:上颌骨缺损手术重建的演变——病例报告及当前技术综述
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;77(4):874.e1-874.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.030. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

两种定制式种植体(PSI)和颧四种植体(QZI)用于新冠后上颌毛霉菌病缺损(PCMMD)修复的比较:有限元分析

Comparison of Two Types of Patient Specific Implants (PSI) and Quad Zygoma Implant (QZI) for Rehabilitation of Post-COVID Maxillary Mucormycosis Defect (PCMMD): Finite Element Analysis.

作者信息

Manekar Varsha Sunil, Datarkar Abhay N, Ghormode Ashlesha, Daware Surendra, Pandilwar Prashant, Sapkal Pranav

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College & Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra 444003 India.

Nagpur, India.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Sep;22(3):688-694. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01950-3. Epub 2023 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1007/s12663-023-01950-3
PMID:37534346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10390377/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The residual post-COVID maxillary mucormycosis defect (PCMMD) were extensive, due to unilateral or bilateral maxillectomies. The Goal of rehabilitation of PCMMD is to deliver a prosthetically driven reconstruction. FEA was to evaluate the biomechanical response of PSI struts (PSI 1), PSI Screw retained (PSI 2) and QZI to masticatory load on virtual simulation to improve accuracy and enhance the design.

AIM

To validate and compare the Biomechanical benefit of the PSI struts, PSI Screw retained, QZI in a case of rehabilitation of post-COVID maxillary mucormycosis defect (PCMMD) by FEA study.

METHODOLOGY

The result of stress to masticatory load on virtual simulation for (1) Maximum and minimum stress (Von Mises stress); (2) the Displacement (in three positions) and (3) the Deformation (Plastic strain) was compared on virtual simulation for PSI 1 and PSI 2 and QZI.

CONCLUSION

The FEA and comparative evaluation of PSI 1, PSI 2 and QZI showed a good resistance to displacement. The stress and strain values are low and acceptable. In comparison QZI shows more stress in the anterior region.

摘要

引言

由于单侧或双侧上颌骨切除术,新冠后上颌毛霉菌病残留缺损(PCMMD)范围广泛。PCMMD修复的目标是进行假体驱动的重建。有限元分析(FEA)旨在评估个性化手术导板支柱(PSI 1)、个性化手术导板螺钉固位(PSI 2)和QZI在虚拟模拟中对咀嚼负荷的生物力学反应,以提高准确性并优化设计。

目的

通过有限元分析研究,验证并比较PSI支柱、PSI螺钉固位、QZI在新冠后上颌毛霉菌病缺损(PCMMD)修复病例中的生物力学优势。

方法

在虚拟模拟中,比较PSI 1、PSI 2和QZI在咀嚼负荷下的应力结果(1. 最大和最小应力(冯·米塞斯应力);2. 位移(三个位置);3. 变形(塑性应变))。

结论

对PSI 1、PSI 2和QZI的有限元分析及比较评估显示,它们具有良好的抗位移能力。应力和应变值较低且可接受。相比之下,QZI在前部区域显示出更多应力。