Suppr超能文献

降钙素原和 C 反应蛋白/降钙素原比值鉴别癌症患者感染性和肿瘤性发热。

Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein/Procalcitonin Ratio for Distinguishing between Infectious and Neoplastic Fever in Cancer Patients.

出版信息

Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Oct;29(7):365-369.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the potential of procalcitonin (PCT) levels and the C-reactive protein/procalcitonin (CRP/PCT) ratio as markers for distinguishing between infectious and neoplastic fever among febrile patients with malignant tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on febrile patients admitted to the hospital with malignant tumors. The patients were categorized into an infection group (67 cases) and a non-infection group (73 cases) based on the presence or absence of positive cultures. PCT levels, CRP levels, and CRP/PCT ratios were compared between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to identify optimal cut-off values.

RESULTS

Data from 140 patients between January 2017 and December 2021 were extracted for analysis. Patients in the infected group showed elevated PCT levels and significantly decreased CRP/PCT ratios compared to the non-infected group (P < .01). The calculated cut-off values for distinguishing infectious and neoplastic fever were 0.52 ng/mL for PCT and 101.80 for CRP/PCT ratio. The ROC curve results revealed good sensitivity for both PCT (74.63%) and CRP/PCT (70.15%), while CRP/PCT demonstrated higher specificity (78.08%) compared to PCT (58.90%).

CONCLUSIONS

PCT and CRP/PCT are both sensitive markers for identifying infection in patients with malignant tumors, with PCT showing slightly better sensitivity but lower specificity than CRP/PCT. Our findings suggest that CRP/PCT may be more valuable than PCT in distinguishing between infectious fever and neoplastic fever in cancer patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨降钙素原(PCT)水平和 C 反应蛋白/降钙素原(CRP/PCT)比值在鉴别恶性肿瘤发热患者感染性和肿瘤性发热中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析我院收治的恶性肿瘤发热患者。根据是否有阳性培养,将患者分为感染组(67 例)和非感染组(73 例)。比较两组 PCT 水平、CRP 水平和 CRP/PCT 比值。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)确定最佳截断值。

结果

共纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月的 140 例患者的数据进行分析。感染组患者 PCT 水平升高,CRP/PCT 比值明显降低,与非感染组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。鉴别感染性和肿瘤性发热的计算截断值为 PCT 0.52ng/ml 和 CRP/PCT 101.80。ROC 曲线结果显示,PCT(74.63%)和 CRP/PCT(70.15%)的敏感性均较好,而 CRP/PCT 的特异性(78.08%)高于 PCT(58.90%)。

结论

PCT 和 CRP/PCT 均是恶性肿瘤患者感染的敏感标志物,PCT 的敏感性略优于 CRP/PCT,但特异性低于 CRP/PCT。我们的研究结果表明,CRP/PCT 可能比 PCT 更能鉴别癌症患者的感染性发热和肿瘤性发热。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验