Suppr超能文献

万古霉素治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Guanxuanzi, Zhang Na, Xu Juan, Yang Tianli, Yin Hong, Cai Yun

机构信息

Medical School of Chinese PLA, Graduate School of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; Center of Medicine Clinical Research, Department of Pharmacy, Medical Supplies Center, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Center of Medicine Clinical Research, Department of Pharmacy, Medical Supplies Center, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Oct;62(4):106946. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106946. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin with the other anti-Gram-positive bacteria antibiotics in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases until August 2022 for studies that compared vancomycin with other antibiotic regimens for treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clinical and microbiological responses, adverse events, relapse rate and mortality were considered.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective studies were included. The efficacy and safety data of vancomycin differed from those of the comparators group. After subgroup analysis, the differences came mainly from the trials compared with daptomycin. Compared to daptomycin, vancomycin showed a lower microbiological cure rate (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.41∼0.82, I = 0%, P = 0.002) and clinical cure rate (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42∼0.68, I = 3%, P < 0.00001), as well as more adverse events (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.43∼7.19, I = 59%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of vancomycin in treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is still excellent but slightly inferior in adverse events. However, this does not affect its use as a first-line drug. Daptomycin is expected to be a better antimicrobial drug.

摘要

目的

评估万古霉素与其他抗革兰氏阳性菌抗生素联合治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们检索了截至2022年8月的PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以查找比较万古霉素与其他抗生素方案治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的研究。考虑了临床和微生物学反应、不良事件、复发率和死亡率。

结果

纳入了15项随机对照试验和9项回顾性研究。万古霉素的有效性和安全性数据与对照组不同。亚组分析后,差异主要来自与达托霉素比较的试验。与达托霉素相比,万古霉素的微生物治愈率较低(OR = 0.58,95% CI = 0.41∼0.82,I = 0%,P = 0.002)和临床治愈率较低(OR = 0.53,95% CI = 0.42∼0.68,I = 3%,P < 0.00001),以及不良事件更多(OR = 3.21,95% CI = 1.43∼7.19,I = 59%,P = 0.005)。

结论

万古霉素治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的疗效仍然很好,但在不良事件方面略逊一筹。然而,这并不影响其作为一线药物的使用。达托霉素有望成为一种更好的抗菌药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验