Suppr超能文献

鞋类与赤足对双腿跳落及跳跃高度测量的影响:一项随机交叉研究。

Effect of Footwear Versus Barefoot on Double-Leg Jump-Landing and Jump Height Measures: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.

作者信息

Hébert-Losier Kim, Boswell-Smith Caleb, Hanzlíková Ivana

机构信息

Te Huataki Waiora School of Health University of Waikato.

Department of Physiotherapy Palacký University Olomouc.

出版信息

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Aug 1;18(4):845-855. doi: 10.26603/001c.81107. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing individuals in their own athletic footwear in clinics is common, but can affect movement, performance, and clinical measures.

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare overall Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) scores, injury risk categorization, specific LESS errors, and jump heights between habitual athletic footwear and barefoot conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized cross-over laboratory study.

METHODS

Eighty healthy individuals (55% male) completed the LESS following standard procedures (i.e., land from a 30-cm box to a distance of 50% of body height and then jump upwards maximally). Participants performed the LESS three times in two randomized conditions: footwear and barefoot. LESS data were extracted from 2D videos to compare group-level mean LESS scores, group-level and individual-level injury risk categorization (5-error threshold), specific landing errors, and jump heights between conditions.

RESULTS

LESS scores were significantly greater (0.3 errors, =0.022) and jump heights were significantly lower (0.6 cm, =0.029) in footwear than barefoot, but differences were ( = 0.18 and -0.07, respectively) and not clinically meaningful. Although the number of high injury-risk participants was not statistically different at a group level (=1.000); 27 individuals (33.8%) exhibited a clinically meaningful difference between conditions of one error or more in LESS score, categorization was inconsistent for 16.3% of individuals, and four of the 17 landing errors significantly differed between conditions.

CONCLUSION

At a group level, habitual athletic footwear does not meaningfully influence LESS scores, risk categorization, or jump height. At an individual level, footwear can meaningfully affect LESS scores, risk categorization, and alter landing strategies. Use of consistent protocol and footwear is advised for assessing movement patterns and injury risk from the LESS given the unknown predictive value of this test barefoot.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.©The Author(s).

摘要

背景

在临床环境中让个体穿着自己的运动鞋进行评估很常见,但这可能会影响运动、表现和临床测量结果。

目的

旨在比较习惯性运动鞋和赤足条件下的整体落地误差评分系统(LESS)分数、损伤风险分类、特定的LESS误差以及跳跃高度。

研究设计

随机交叉实验室研究。

方法

80名健康个体(55%为男性)按照标准程序完成LESS测试(即从30厘米高的箱子上跳到身体高度50%的距离处,然后进行最大幅度的向上跳跃)。参与者在两种随机条件下各进行三次LESS测试:穿着运动鞋和赤足。从二维视频中提取LESS数据,以比较组水平的平均LESS分数、组水平和个体水平的损伤风险分类(5误差阈值)、特定的落地误差以及不同条件下的跳跃高度。

结果

与赤足相比,穿着运动鞋时LESS分数显著更高(高0.3分,P = 0.022),跳跃高度显著更低(低0.6厘米,P = 0.029),但效应量分别为0.18和 -0.07,在临床上无意义。虽然在组水平上高损伤风险参与者的数量没有统计学差异(P = 1.000);但27名个体(33.8%)在两种条件下的LESS分数出现了一个或更多误差的具有临床意义的差异,16.3%的个体分类不一致,并且17种落地误差中有4种在不同条件下有显著差异。

结论

在组水平上,习惯性运动鞋对LESS分数、风险分类或跳跃高度没有显著影响。在个体水平上,运动鞋会显著影响LESS分数、风险分类,并改变落地策略。鉴于该测试赤足时的预测价值未知,建议在使用LESS评估运动模式和损伤风险时采用一致的方案和运动鞋。

证据水平

3级。©作者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfec/10399122/ae269bc8efe7/ijspt_2023_18_4_81107_167198.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验