Discipline of Cardiology, Saolta Healthcare Group, Health Service Executive, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory, Clinical Science Institute, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Jan;113(1):116-125. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02280-7. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Estimation of regurgitant fraction by videodensitometry (VD-AR) of aortic root angiograms is a new tool for objective grading of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Stratification with boundaries at 6% and 17% has been proposed to reflect "none/trace", "mild" and "moderate or higher" PVR.
We sought to investigate the association of strata of VD-AR with 3-year mortality and to compare VD-AR with visual grading of angiograms.
We interrogated our database for patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI from 2008 to 2018. Vital status of the patients was obtained from population registers. To test differences in survival and estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) we fitted Cox models.
Our retrospective study included 699 patients with evaluable angiograms at completion of the TAVI procedure. Cumulative 3-year mortality was 35.0% in 261 (37.3%) patients with VD-AR < 6%, 33.9% in 325 (46.5%) patients with VD-AR between 6 and 17% (HR [95% confidence interval] 1.06 [0.80-1.42]; P = 0.684) and 47.2% in 113 (16.2%) patients with VD-AR > 17% (HR 1.57 [1.11-2.22]; P = 0.011). Visually, PVR was graded as "none/trace" in 470 (67.2%) patients, as "mild" in 219 (31.3%) and as "moderate" in 10 (1.4%). Both mild PVR and moderate PVR on visual grading were significantly associated with mortality (HRs 1.31 [1.12-1.54]; P = 0.001 and 1.92 [1.13-3.24]; P = 0.015; respectively).
VD-AR > 17%, but not VD-AR 6-17%, was independently associated with mortality. Compared with subjective visual evaluation, VD-AR resulted in a smaller proportion of patients with PVR classified as prognostically relevant.
主动脉根部造影的视频密度法(VD-AR)估测反流量可用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后瓣周漏(PVR)的客观分级。目前提出以 6%和 17%为界值分层,以反映“无/微量”、“轻度”和“中度或以上”的 PVR。
本研究旨在探讨 VD-AR 分层与 3 年死亡率的关系,并比较 VD-AR 与血管造影的视觉分级。
我们检索了 2008 年至 2018 年接受经股 TAVI 的患者数据库。通过人口登记处获取患者的生存状态。采用 Cox 模型检验生存差异并估计校正后的危险比(HR)。
本回顾性研究共纳入 699 例 TAVI 术后完成的可评估血管造影患者。261 例 VD-AR<6%的患者 3 年累积死亡率为 37.3%(35.0%),325 例 VD-AR 在 6%至 17%之间的患者为 46.5%(33.9%)(HR[95%置信区间]为 1.06[0.80-1.42];P=0.684),113 例 VD-AR>17%的患者为 16.2%(47.2%)(HR 为 1.57[1.11-2.22];P=0.011)。视觉上,470 例(67.2%)患者的 PVR 分级为“无/微量”,219 例(31.3%)为“轻度”,10 例(1.4%)为“中度”。视觉分级的轻度 PVR 和中度 PVR 均与死亡率显著相关(HR 分别为 1.31[1.12-1.54]和 1.92[1.13-3.24];P 值均<0.001)。
VD-AR>17%,而非 VD-AR 6-17%,与死亡率独立相关。与主观视觉评估相比,VD-AR 使更多患者的 PVR 分类为具有预后意义。