Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Edirne Sultan 1st Murat State Hospital, Edirne, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Acta Radiol. 2023 Oct;64(10):2828-2835. doi: 10.1177/02841851231191069. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
Lateral epicondylitis, also known as tennis elbow, is the most common elbow pain in the adult age group.
To evaluate common extensor tendon (CET) vascularity with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) before and after extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasound (US) treatment in patients with lateral epycondylitis and to compare the effects of two different treatments on tendon vascularity.
Patients with lateral epycondylitis were divided into two groups; 30 patients were treated with ESWT (group 1) and 30 patients were treated with therapeutic US (group 2). We performed a high-frequency (14-MHz) linear array transducer to evaluate tendon anatomy and vascularity before and after treatment in both groups.
The decrease in Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) score after treatment was statistically significant compared to pre-treatment for both groups ( < 0.001). Likewise, the decrease in visual analog scale (VAS) score after treatment was statistically significant compared to pre-treatment for both groups ( < 0.001). A significant difference was found between the CET SMI values of group 1 and group 2 after treatment, according to the chi-square test ( < 0.001). In the post-treatment VAS and PRTEE comparison of both groups, the score reduction in group 1 was higher than in group 2, and this decrease was statistically significant ( < 0.001).
We can evaluate CET vascularization with the SMI method as a new potential diagnostic tool in comparing the effectiveness of different treatments in cases of lateral epicondylitis.
外侧上髁炎,又称网球肘,是成年人群中最常见的肘部疼痛。
在体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)和超声(US)治疗外侧上髁炎前后,使用卓越的微血管成像(SMI)评估常见伸肌腱(CET)的血管生成,并比较两种不同治疗方法对肌腱血管生成的影响。
外侧上髁炎患者分为两组;30 名患者接受 ESWT(第 1 组)治疗,30 名患者接受治疗性 US(第 2 组)治疗。我们使用高频(14MHz)线性阵列换能器评估两组治疗前后的肌腱解剖结构和血管生成。
与治疗前相比,两组患者的患者网球肘评估(PRTEE)评分在治疗后均有统计学意义( < 0.001)。同样,两组患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)在治疗后与治疗前相比均有统计学意义( < 0.001)。根据卡方检验,治疗后第 1 组和第 2 组的 CET SMI 值之间存在显著差异( < 0.001)。在两组治疗后的 VAS 和 PRTEE 比较中,第 1 组的评分降低高于第 2 组,这种降低具有统计学意义( < 0.001)。
我们可以使用 SMI 方法评估 CET 血管化,作为比较外侧上髁炎不同治疗效果的一种新的潜在诊断工具。