• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes Comparing Oncoplastic Breast Surgery and Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.长期患者报告结局比较:肿瘤整形保乳术与传统保乳术的倾向性评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7091-7098. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13962-x. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Patient-reported Outcomes Utilizing the BREAST-Q Questionnaire After Breast-Conserving Surgery With and Without Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保乳手术联合与不联合整形保乳术患者报告结局的 BREAST-Q 问卷调查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Oct 15;44(11):NP778-NP789. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae002.
3
Oncoplastic breast surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery: a comparative retrospective study.肿瘤整形乳房手术与传统保乳手术的比较性回顾研究
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1236-1241. doi: 10.1111/ans.15245. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
The Impact of Breast-Conserving Surgery Re-excision on Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the BREAST-Q.保乳手术再次切除对 BREAST-Q 患者报告结局的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5341-5349. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13592-3. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Patient Satisfaction Following Level II Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Comparison with Mastectomy Utililizing the Breast-Q Questionnaire will be published in Surgical Oncology.患者在接受 II 级肿瘤整形保乳手术后的满意度:利用乳房 Q 量表与乳房切除术的比较将发表在《外科肿瘤学》上。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:556-559. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic breast surgery in breast cancer patients: A matched cohort study.乳腺癌患者保乳手术后的临床结局和患者报告结局:一项匹配队列研究。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2024 Mar 1;87(3):320-327. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001055. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
7
Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer.乳腺癌保乳手术与肿瘤整形保乳术后患者报告结局的比较
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05544-2. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形保乳手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 29;10(10):CD013658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.
9
The role of oncoplastic breast surgery in the management of breast cancer treated with primary chemotherapy.肿瘤整形乳房手术在接受原发性化疗的乳腺癌治疗中的作用。
Breast. 2013 Dec;22(6):1189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.055. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
10
Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.保乳治疗与乳腺癌根治术后乳房重建的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8030-8039. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15294-w. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Surgeon Satisfaction Discrepancy following Breast Reduction Surgery: A 10-year Analysis of Aesthetic Outcomes and Quality of Life.乳房缩小术后患者与外科医生满意度差异:美学效果与生活质量的10年分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Apr 18;13(4):e6709. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006709. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Cohort study comparing volume replacement oncoplastic breast surgery with standard wide local excision for breast cancer.一项队列研究,比较乳腺癌容积置换肿瘤整形乳房手术与标准广泛局部切除手术。
Gland Surg. 2025 Feb 28;14(2):129-138. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-385. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) mastectomy with reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes in an underserved population.肿瘤整形保乳手术(OBCS)与乳房切除术后重建:在服务欠缺人群中的疗效比较。
Gland Surg. 2024 Mar 27;13(3):358-373. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-403. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
4
Expanded indications for breast-conserving surgery with oncoplastic approaches compared to conventional approaches: a single-center retrospective comparative cohort study.与传统方法相比,肿瘤整形保乳手术的适应证扩展:一项单中心回顾性比较队列研究。
Gland Surg. 2023 Nov 24;12(11):1594-1609. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-371. Epub 2023 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Breast Cancer Surgery With Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being in Young Breast Cancer Survivors.乳腺癌手术与年轻乳腺癌幸存者生活质量和心理社会健康的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Nov 1;155(11):1035-1042. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3325.
2
American trends in oncoplastic breast surgery for 2006-2015: A retrospective analysis of NSQIP database.2006 - 2015年美国肿瘤整形乳房手术趋势:对国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库的回顾性分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Mar;74(3):644-710. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
3
Quality-of-Life and Surgical Outcomes for Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Therapeutic Reduction Mammoplasty Versus Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction.保乳术与即刻乳房重建术治疗乳腺癌患者的生活质量和手术结局比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4502-4512. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08574-8. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer.乳腺癌保乳手术与肿瘤整形保乳术后患者报告结局的比较
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05544-2. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
A Consensus Definition and Classification System of Oncoplastic Surgery Developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons.美国乳腺外科学会制定的肿瘤整形手术共识定义和分类系统。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3436-3444. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07345-4. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
6
Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.乳腺癌根治术后患者长期报告的结局。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):891-899. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677.
7
Use of the BREAST-Q™ Survey in the Prospective Evaluation of Reduction Mammaplasty Outcomes.BREAST-Q™ 调查问卷在缩乳术效果前瞻性评估中的应用。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;42(2):388-395. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-1009-6. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
8
Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Better after Oncoplastic Breast Conservation than after Mastectomy and Autologous Reconstruction.患者报告的结果显示,肿瘤整形保乳术后的效果优于乳房切除术后自体乳房重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jul 24;5(7):e1419. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001419. eCollection 2017 Jul.
9
Comparing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: Case-matched patient reported outcomes.比较肿瘤整形保乳手术与乳房切除术及即刻乳房重建术:病例匹配患者报告的结局
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Oct;70(10):1377-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
Oncoplastic techniques: Attitudes and changing practice amongst breast and plastic surgeons in Great Britain.肿瘤整形技术:英国乳腺外科医生和整形外科医生的态度及实践变化
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 13.

长期患者报告结局比较:肿瘤整形保乳术与传统保乳术的倾向性评分匹配分析。

Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes Comparing Oncoplastic Breast Surgery and Conventional Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

机构信息

Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7091-7098. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13962-x. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-023-13962-x
PMID:37556008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10996134/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) combines plastic surgery techniques with conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and expands BCS eligibility. Limited data are available on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after OBS. Here we compare long-term PROs after OBS and BCS utilizing the BREAST-Q.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women undergoing OBS or BCS between 2006 and 2019 who completed ≥ 1 long-term BREAST-Q survey 3-5 years postoperatively were identified. Baseline characteristics were compared between women who underwent OBS/BCS. Women who underwent OBS were paired with those who underwent BCS using 1:2 propensity matching [by age, body mass index (BMI), race, T stage, and multifocality]. BREAST-Q scores were compared preoperatively and 3-5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 297 patients were included for analysis (99 OBS/198 BCS). Women who underwent OBS were younger (p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (p = 0.005) and multifocal disease incidence (p = 0.004). There was no difference between groups in nodal stage, re-excision rates, axillary surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or radiotherapy. After propensity matching preoperatively, women who underwent OBS reported lower psychosocial well-being (63 versus 100, p = 0.039) but similar breast satisfaction and sexual well-being compared with women who underwent BCS; however, only three patients who underwent BCS had preoperative BREAST-Q scores available for review. In long-term follow-up, women who underwent OBS reported lower psychosocial scores (74 versus 93, p = 0.011) 4 years postoperatively, but not at 5 years (76 versus 77, p = 0.83). There was no difference in long-term breast satisfaction or sexual well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who undergo OBS present with a larger disease burden and may represent a group of non-traditional BCS candidates; they reported similar long-term breast satisfaction and sexual well-being compared with women who undergo BCS. While women who underwent OBS reported lower psychosocial well-being scores preoperatively and during a portion of the follow-up period, this difference was no longer seen at 5 years postoperatively.

摘要

引言

肿瘤整形乳房切除术(OBS)将整形手术技术与传统的保乳手术(BCS)相结合,并扩大了 BCS 的适应证。目前关于 OBS 后患者报告结局(PROs)的资料有限。本研究利用 BREAST-Q 比较了 OBS 和 BCS 后的长期 PROs。

方法

本研究纳入了 2006 年至 2019 年间接受 OBS 或 BCS 治疗且术后 3-5 年完成至少 1 次长期 BREAST-Q 调查的患者。比较了 OBS/BCS 组患者的基线特征。对接受 OBS 的患者进行 1:2 倾向匹配(按年龄、体重指数(BMI)、种族、T 分期和多灶性),以匹配接受 BCS 的患者。比较了术前和术后 3-5 年的 BREAST-Q 评分。

结果

共纳入 297 例患者进行分析(99 例 OBS/198 例 BCS)。接受 OBS 的患者年龄更小(p < 0.001),BMI 更高(p = 0.005),多发病灶发生率更高(p = 0.004)。两组患者在淋巴结分期、再次切除术率、腋窝手术、化疗、内分泌治疗或放疗方面无差异。术前倾向匹配后,与接受 BCS 的患者相比,接受 OBS 的患者报告的心理社会健康状况较低(63 分与 100 分,p = 0.039),但乳房满意度和性健康状况相似;然而,仅有 3 例接受 BCS 的患者的术前 BREAST-Q 评分可供回顾。在长期随访中,接受 OBS 的患者报告术后 4 年时心理社会评分较低(74 分与 93 分,p = 0.011),但术后 5 年时无差异(76 分与 77 分,p = 0.83)。长期乳房满意度和性健康状况无差异。

结论

接受 OBS 的患者疾病负担更大,可能代表了一组非传统的 BCS 候选者;与接受 BCS 的患者相比,他们报告了相似的长期乳房满意度和性健康状况。虽然接受 OBS 的患者在术前和随访的部分阶段报告的心理社会健康状况评分较低,但在术后 5 年时这种差异不再存在。