Yang Tae-Won, Kim Young-Soo, Kim Do-Hyung, Yeom Jung Sook, Kwon Oh-Young
Department of Neurology, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea; Department of Neurology, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea; Department of Neurology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Seizure. 2023 Oct;111:87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.07.025. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
Numerous inventories to identify felt stigma (FS) in people living with epilepsy (PLWE) have been developed. Past studies have mainly focused on the relationship between FS scores and clinical factors, making it challenging to delineate FS proportions and compare FS between groups. We aimed to integrate FS proportions in PLWE and compare them by continent.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Among the identified studies, we chose the ones providing an FS proportion measured by Jacoby's Stigma Scale (JSS) and its revised version (JSS-R) in PLWE. We applied the random-effects model.
A total of 63 datasets from 47 studies were included. There were 29,924 PLWE, with 14,323 of them experiencing FS. The overall FS proportion was 48.4%. Of these datasets, 51 used JSS, and 12 used JSS-R. The FS proportions were 44.9% for the former and 62.1% for the latter, with significant heterogeneity. In the intercontinental comparison with 51 datasets employing JSS, the difference in FS proportions was insignificant: 51.2% in Africa, 47.2% in Europe, 35.4% in Asia, and 28.8% in the Middle East. Furthermore, the meta-regression revealed that the year of each primary study did not influence the FS proportion.
Among PLWE, FS proportions depended on the choice of a measurement tool. When measured using JSS, the FS proportion was 44.9%, while it was 62.1% when evaluated with JSS-R. Even though the FS proportions were integrated differently, no substantial differences were observed between continents.
已开发出众多用于识别癫痫患者(PLWE)感知耻辱感(FS)的量表。过去的研究主要集中在FS评分与临床因素之间的关系,这使得确定FS比例以及比较不同组之间的FS变得具有挑战性。我们旨在整合PLWE中的FS比例,并按大陆进行比较。
我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、科学引文索引和Scopus。在确定的研究中,我们选择了那些提供通过雅各比耻辱感量表(JSS)及其修订版(JSS - R)测量的PLWE中FS比例的研究。我们应用随机效应模型。
共纳入了来自47项研究的63个数据集。有29924名PLWE,其中14323人经历了FS。总体FS比例为48.4%。在这些数据集中,51个使用了JSS,12个使用了JSS - R。前者的FS比例为44.9%,后者为62.1%,存在显著异质性。在使用JSS的51个数据集的洲际比较中,FS比例的差异不显著:非洲为51.2%,欧洲为47.2%,亚洲为35.4%,中东为28.8%。此外,元回归显示每项原始研究的年份并不影响FS比例。
在PLWE中,FS比例取决于测量工具的选择。使用JSS测量时,FS比例为44.9%,而用JSS - R评估时为62.1%。尽管FS比例的整合方式不同,但各大陆之间未观察到实质性差异。