• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即刻种植术中在美学区跳跃间隙的处理:锥形束 CT 引导下的虚拟种植体规划

Jumping gap in immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone: A virtual implant planning using cone-beam computed tomography.

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University, Egypt.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic surgery department, Mainz University, Germany.

出版信息

J Prosthodont Res. 2024 Apr 8;68(2):347-353. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00033. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

DOI:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00033
PMID:37574277
Abstract

PURPOSE

A jumping gap (JG) refers to the implant's future buccal wall; this study aims to estimate the jumping gap dimension in relation to virtual implant placement and subsequently link the implant diameter and implant position with the anatomical site.

METHODS

This observational study was conducted to analyze the maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using OnDemand software. The horizontal jumping gap dimension of each tooth was assessed by subtracting the calculated virtual implant diameter from the socket dimensions.

RESULTS

A total of 253 anterior and premolar maxillary teeth were analyzed from 52 CBCT scans. The estimated JG dimensions were 1.23 ± 0.59 mm, 1.80 ± 0.64 mm, 3.02 ± 0.69 mm, for central incisors, lateral incisors and canines respectively, 3.70 ± 0.68 mm for the first premolars showing the highest horizontal gap and 3.19 ± 0.88 mm for second premolars. The incisors showed the smallest horizontal gap compared to the canines and premolars.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of JG, immediate implant placement is more favorable at the canine and premolar sites. By contrast, the incisors sites should be handled with extreme caution, where the use of narrower implants is advisable when necessary.

摘要

目的

跳隙(JG)是指种植体未来的颊侧壁;本研究旨在评估与虚拟种植体放置相关的跳隙尺寸,并将种植体直径和种植体位置与解剖部位联系起来。

方法

本观察性研究旨在使用 OnDemand 软件分析来自锥形束 CT(CBCT)扫描的上颌美学区的牙齿。通过从牙槽窝尺寸中减去计算出的虚拟种植体直径来评估每个牙齿的水平跳隙尺寸。

结果

对 52 个 CBCT 扫描的 253 个上颌前牙和前磨牙进行了分析。估计的 JG 尺寸分别为中切牙 1.23±0.59mm、侧切牙 1.80±0.64mm、尖牙 3.02±0.69mm,第一前磨牙的水平间隙最大,为 3.70±0.68mm,第二前磨牙的水平间隙最小,为 3.19±0.88mm。与尖牙和前磨牙相比,切牙的水平间隙最小。

结论

就 JG 而言,犬牙和前磨牙部位更有利于即刻种植体放置。相比之下,切牙部位需要格外小心,必要时应使用较窄的种植体。

相似文献

1
Jumping gap in immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone: A virtual implant planning using cone-beam computed tomography.即刻种植术中在美学区跳跃间隙的处理:锥形束 CT 引导下的虚拟种植体规划
J Prosthodont Res. 2024 Apr 8;68(2):347-353. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00033. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography.上颌美学区面部骨壁尺寸及牙根矢状位置分析:一项使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的回顾性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1123-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3348.
3
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Buccal Bone Thickness in Anterior Maxillary Teeth: Relevance to Immediate Implant Placement.锥形束计算机断层扫描对上颌前牙颊侧骨厚度的评估:与即刻种植的相关性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):880-887. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6274.
4
Frequency of screw-retained angulated screw channel single crown following immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: A cone beam computed tomography study.在美学区域内,即刻种植和临时修复后,带角度螺丝通道单冠螺钉固位的频率:锥形束 CT 研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Oct;25(5):789-794. doi: 10.1111/cid.13227. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
Comprehensive analysis of the maxillary esthetic zone for immediate implant placement using cone beam computed tomography: A study of 352 maxillary images.利用锥形束 CT 对上颌美学区进行即刻种植的综合分析:352 例上颌图像研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 May;131(5):903.e1-903.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning.采用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测量上颌前牙区牙槽嵴尺寸及形态,用于即刻种植治疗计划制定。
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Jun 10;15:65. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0055-1.
7
Does the sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth affect the decision making on immediate implants in the anterior maxilla? A CBCT-based study.上颌前牙矢状根位对上颌前部即刻种植决策的影响:基于 CBCT 的研究。
Dent Med Probl. 2024 Jan-Feb;61(1):65-70. doi: 10.17219/dmp/133072.
8
Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对上颌牙根间骨进行定量评估以确定正畸微型种植体的双皮质放置。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Jun;147(6):725-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.018.
9
Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.上颌颊侧和腭侧尖牙阻生的病因分析:基于锥形束 CT 分析的观点。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.021.
10
Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation.上颌前牙和前磨牙颊牙槽骨尺寸的评估:锥形束 CT 研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1514-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of xenograft and allograft bone graft for oral and maxillofacial surgical preparation prior to dental implantation: A systematic review.牙种植术前口腔颌面外科手术准备中异种骨移植与同种异体骨移植的比较:一项系统评价
F1000Res. 2025 Jul 22;14:718. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.163924.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Insights into the Current Management Techniques for Peri-Implant Gaps: A Systematic Review.种植体周围间隙当前管理技术的见解:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3351. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103351.
3
A Retrospective Study Using a Novel Body-Shift Implant Design with a Novel Alloplastic Particulate Grafting Material in Immediate Extraction Sockets.
一项回顾性研究:在即刻拔牙窝中使用新型身体移位种植体设计及新型异体颗粒移植材料
Eur J Dent. 2025 Jul;19(3):860-867. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1801849. Epub 2025 Feb 3.