Hendrycks Russell J, Reed Evelyn R, Graham Emily M, Patel Niki K, Rosales Megan, Mendenhall Shaun D
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Aug 11;11(8):e5167. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005167. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Numerous effective techniques for primary tendon coaptations exist. However, these techniques are complex and require a substantial amount of training to become proficient. Recently, a novel tendon stapler device (TSD) was developed that could potentially diminish the discrepancies among surgeons of varying levels of training. We hypothesized that the TSD would be easier to learn and would demonstrate improved learning curve efficiencies across participants of differing tendon repair experience compared with traditional suture methods. Participants included a novice, intermediate, and expert in tendon repairs. Comparisons were performed on wrist-level flexors and extensors from human donor arms. The suture repairs were performed with a modified Kessler with a horizontal mattress and were performed in one session on two donor arms by each participant. In a second session, each participant performed the TSD repairs on the matched, contralateral donor arms. Scatterplots fitted with Loess curves, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey pairwise comparisons, two-sided independent samples test, and Fisher exact test were used to analyze findings. Results of our study showed that TSD repair times did not vary significantly by experience level. Suture repairs reached a stable "learned" level around repair #30, whereas the TSD repairs showed a more efficient curve that stabilized around repair #23. The TSD required less educational time, demonstrated a more efficient learning curve, and showed less variability across participants and repair order. Overall, the TSD is easy to adopt and may carry positive implications for surgeons and patients.
目前存在多种有效的一期肌腱缝合技术。然而,这些技术复杂,需要大量训练才能熟练掌握。最近,一种新型肌腱吻合器装置(TSD)被研发出来,它有可能减少不同训练水平外科医生之间的差异。我们假设,与传统缝合方法相比,TSD更容易学习,并且在不同肌腱修复经验的参与者中能展现出更高的学习曲线效率。参与者包括一名肌腱修复新手、一名中级水平者和一名专家。对来自人类供体手臂的腕部屈肌和伸肌进行了比较。缝合修复采用改良的Kessler水平褥式缝合法,每位参与者在一次操作中对两条供体手臂进行修复。在第二次操作中,每位参与者对配对的对侧供体手臂进行TSD修复。使用拟合Loess曲线的散点图、单因素方差分析、Tukey两两比较、双侧独立样本检验和Fisher精确检验来分析结果。我们的研究结果表明,TSD修复时间在不同经验水平之间没有显著差异。缝合修复在大约第30次修复时达到稳定的“学习”水平,而TSD修复显示出更高效的曲线,在大约第23次修复时趋于稳定。TSD所需的训练时间更少,展现出更高效的学习曲线,并且在参与者和修复顺序之间的变异性更小。总体而言,TSD易于采用,可能对外科医生和患者都有积极影响。