Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 161 Warren Street, Tiernan Hall, 365, Newark, New Jersey, 07102, USA.
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Anthropology Department, 10th and Constitution Ave, PO 37012, NW, 20560, Washington DC, USA.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Jun;20(2):552-559. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00691-6. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
The main aim of this work was to validate the detection of saliva samples from denim, cotton, and polyester fabrics aged up to six months, applying rapid immunochromatographic tests resulting in the analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA recovered. A comparison was also carried out between two saliva detection tests, Laboratory and Crime Scene. 50 μl saliva samples (three per time and test) were deposited on denim, cotton, and polyester fabrics. After 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90, 150, and 180 days of storage at room temperature, the samples were recovered by swabbing and detected by SERATEC Amylase (Laboratory) test and SERATEC SALIVA CS (Crime Scene) test (SERATEC, Göttingen, Germany). DNA was isolated from the swab extraction buffer applying a silica-based methodology, and quantified based on fluorescent and human-specific quantifications. Then, it was submitted to STR profiling and mtDNA sequencing. According to our results, saliva stains up to six months after deposition remain valid specimens. The intensity of the bands varied among fabric type and time. Total DNA was successfully recovered from all tested samples, though with the limitations of obtaining partial nuclear DNA profiles from the oldest samples. In contrast, complete characterization of mtDNA was achieved from all samples. Lab and CS tests performed similar on the detection of saliva, as well as, DNA yield and profiling. Future research will be able to expand these results, analyzing the stability of other body fluids and the sensitivity of rapid immunochromatographic tests to detect them.
本工作的主要目的是验证对经过长达六个月储存的牛仔布、棉和聚酯纤维上的唾液样本的检测,应用快速免疫层析检测法分析核和线粒体 DNA 的回收情况。我们还对两种唾液检测试验(实验室法和犯罪现场法)进行了比较。将 50μl 唾液样本(每种方法每次和每种样本各 3 个)分别滴在牛仔布、棉和聚酯纤维上。在室温下储存 1、3、7、14、21、30、60、90、150 和 180 天后,用拭子对样本进行回收,并用 SERATEC Amylase(实验室)检测法和 SERATEC SALIVA CS(犯罪现场)检测法(SERATEC,哥廷根,德国)进行检测。从拭子提取缓冲液中提取 DNA ,采用基于硅的方法,根据荧光和人类特异性定量进行定量。然后,对其进行 STR 分析和 mtDNA 测序。根据我们的结果,沉积后长达六个月的唾液斑仍可作为有效样本。条带的强度随织物类型和时间的不同而变化。从所有测试样本中均成功回收了总 DNA,尽管从最旧的样本中仅获得了部分核 DNA 图谱。相反,所有样本的 mtDNA 均得到了完整的特征描述。实验室法和犯罪现场法在唾液检测以及 DNA 产量和图谱分析方面的性能相似。未来的研究将能够扩展这些结果,分析其他体液的稳定性以及快速免疫层析检测法检测它们的灵敏度。