Suppr超能文献

英国重症监护研究联合注册——2019年更新版

Co-enrolment to UK Critical Care Studies - A 2019 update.

作者信息

Felton Timothy, Pattison Natalie, Fletcher Simon, Finney Simon, Walsh Tim, Dark Paul

机构信息

Acute Intensive Care Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Feb;23(1):53-57. doi: 10.1177/1751143720971542. Epub 2020 Nov 8.

Abstract

In 2013, a group of clinicians on behalf of the National Institute for Health Research, collaborated with ICU Steps to produce guidance about people being enrolled in more than one critical care trial. This is referred to as "co-enrolment" and can be where a person takes part in one study at the same time as another study (or one after the other in a short time-frame). For instance, being part of a study looking at sepsis drugs and a mechanical ventilation weaning study. The drivers for developing this guidance were a lack of any existing guidance, nationally and internationally, at that time, and a desire to ensure high quality research is conducted. The emphasis was on making trials as safe as possible for patients and ensuring robust trial outcomes. Critical care was seen to lead in this, with our exemplar guidance used across all health research. We wish to revisit this guidance now that there is more experience of coenrolment in critical care trials. There is also more awareness of different consent models, such as deferred consent (taking consent when a person is awake and able to give consent) and consultee consent (asking families or independent professionals to consent). Consenting to coenrolment is an important ethical consideration for the revision of this guidance.

摘要

2013年,一群代表英国国家卫生研究院的临床医生与重症监护步骤组织合作,制定了关于人们参与多项重症监护试验的指南。这被称为“共同入组”,可能是一个人同时参与一项研究和另一项研究(或者在短时间内先后参与两项研究)。例如,参与一项关于脓毒症药物的研究和一项机械通气撤机研究。制定该指南的原因是当时国内和国际上都缺乏任何现有的指南,并且希望确保开展高质量的研究。重点是使试验对患者尽可能安全,并确保试验结果可靠。重症监护在这方面被视为引领者,我们的范例指南在所有健康研究中都被采用。鉴于现在在重症监护试验中有了更多共同入组的经验,我们希望重新审视该指南。对于不同的同意模式也有了更多认识,比如延迟同意(在一个人清醒且能够给予同意时获取同意)和咨询同意(要求家属或独立专业人员同意)。同意共同入组是修订本指南的一个重要伦理考量。

相似文献

1
Co-enrolment to UK Critical Care Studies - A 2019 update.英国重症监护研究联合注册——2019年更新版
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Feb;23(1):53-57. doi: 10.1177/1751143720971542. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

本文引用的文献

1
A Core Outcome Set for Critical Care Ventilation Trials.关键护理通气试验的核心结局集。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):1324-1331. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003904.
5
Co-enrolment of Participants into Multiple Cancer Trials: Benefits and Challenges.参与者同时参加多项癌症试验:益处与挑战。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Jul;29(7):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验