Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Vet Surg. 2024 Jan;53(1):184-193. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14011. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
To report sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections (SSIs) and describe the impact of active surveillance on SSI detection.
Prospective, cohort study.
Dogs and cats undergoing soft tissue or orthopedic surgery over a 12-month period at a referral hospital.
Clients were emailed a questionnaire 30 days postoperatively, or 90 days where an implant was used. Three algorithms were developed to diagnose SSIs using one or both of two criteria: (1) presence of any wound healing problems; (2) wound dehiscence or antibiotic prescription, and either purulent discharge or two or more clinical signs (redness, pain, heat, swelling, discharge). Algorithmic diagnoses were compared to gold standard diagnoses made by veterinarians.
Of 754 surgical procedures, 309 responses were completed with 173 corresponding gold standard diagnoses. The most accurate algorithm determined "SSI" or "No SSI" from 90.2% of responses with 95.5% (92.4-98.6) accuracy, 82.6% (77-88.3) sensitivity, 97.7% (95.5-100) specificity, 86.4% (81.2-91.5) positive predictive value, and 97% (94.5-99.6) negative predictive value. "No SSI" was diagnosed in responses not meeting criterion 1, and "SSI" in responses meeting criteria 1 and 2. "Inconclusive" responses, comprising 9.8% of responses, met criterion 1 but not 2. Overall SSI rate was 62/754 (8.2%) and 12/62 (19.4%) SSIs were detected by active surveillance only.
Use of this client questionnaire accurately diagnosed SSIs; active surveillance increased SSI detection.
Surveillance of SSIs should be active and can be simplified by using a client questionnaire and algorithmic diagnoses, allowing automated distribution, data collection and analysis.
报告用于诊断手术部位感染(SSI)的患者问卷的灵敏度、特异度、预测值和准确度,并描述主动监测对 SSI 检测的影响。
前瞻性队列研究。
在转诊医院接受软组织或骨科手术的犬和猫,时间为 12 个月。
术后 30 天(使用植入物时为 90 天),通过电子邮件向客户发送问卷。开发了 3 种算法,使用以下 2 个标准中的 1 个或 2 个来诊断 SSI:(1)存在任何伤口愈合问题;(2)伤口裂开或使用抗生素,以及脓性分泌物或 2 种或更多临床体征(发红、疼痛、发热、肿胀、分泌物)。算法诊断与兽医做出的金标准诊断进行比较。
在 754 例手术中,有 309 例完成了问卷,其中 173 例有对应的金标准诊断。最准确的算法通过 90.2%的回复确定了“SSI”或“无 SSI”,准确度为 95.5%(92.4%-98.6%),灵敏度为 82.6%(77%-88.3%),特异度为 97.7%(95.5%-100%),阳性预测值为 86.4%(81.2%-91.5%),阴性预测值为 97%(94.5%-99.6%)。“无 SSI”诊断用于不符合标准 1 的回复,“SSI”用于符合标准 1 和 2 的回复。“不确定”的回复,占 9.8%,符合标准 1,但不符合标准 2。总的 SSI 发生率为 62/754(8.2%),12/62(19.4%)的 SSI 仅通过主动监测检测到。
使用该患者问卷可准确诊断 SSI;主动监测可提高 SSI 的检出率。
SSI 监测应积极进行,可以通过使用患者问卷和算法诊断来简化,从而实现自动分发、数据收集和分析。