Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesiology, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb;39(2):326-331.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.039. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
Hypothermia is a common perioperative problem that can lead to severe complications. We evaluated whether a heated mattress (HM) is superior to a warm air blanket (WA) in preventing perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
A retrospective cohort study was performed in a teaching hospital and data were collected for all patients undergoing THA or TKA between January 1, 2015 and May 1, 2022. We used logistic and linear regressions to analyze hypothermia occurrence and important complications. Results were adjusted for confounders and time, and was present in all subgroups and after imputation of missing data.
In total, 4,683 of 5,497 patients had information on type of heating. We found more perioperative hypothermia in patients treated with an HM compared to a WA for both THA (odds ratio-adjusted 1.42 [1.0 to 1.6] P = .06) and TKA (odds ratio-adjusted 2.10 [1.5 to 3.0] P < .01). There was no difference in postoperative infections between groups (all between 0.5% and 1.3%). Patients who had an HM significantly stayed longer in the postoperative ward (a mean difference of 4 [TKA] to 6 [THA] minutes, P < .01), but there was no difference in hospital stay.
A WA is superior compared to an HM in preventing perioperative hypothermia, with no increased risk of complications. Patients who have an HM stayed longer at the postoperative ward, potentially because of higher hypothermia rates. Therefore, it is suggested to use a WA instead of an HM.
低体温是一种常见的围手术期问题,可导致严重并发症。我们评估了在接受全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者中,使用加热床垫(HM)是否优于使用热空气毯(WA)来预防围手术期低体温。
在一家教学医院进行了回顾性队列研究,收集了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 1 日期间所有接受 THA 或 TKA 的患者的数据。我们使用逻辑回归和线性回归来分析低体温的发生和重要并发症。结果经过混杂因素和时间的调整,并在所有亚组和缺失数据的插补后进行了呈现。
共有 4683 名 5497 名患者的加热类型信息,我们发现与 WA 相比,HM 组的 THA(调整后的优势比为 1.42[1.0 至 1.6],P =.06)和 TKA(调整后的优势比为 2.10[1.5 至 3.0],P <.01)患者的围手术期低体温发生率更高。两组之间的术后感染率无差异(均为 0.5%至 1.3%)。HM 组的患者在术后病房的停留时间明显更长(TKA 平均差异为 4 分钟[至 6 分钟],THA 差异为 6 分钟[至 12 分钟],P <.01),但住院时间无差异。
与 HM 相比,WA 在预防围手术期低体温方面更具优势,且并发症风险无增加。使用 HM 的患者在术后病房停留时间更长,可能是由于低体温发生率更高。因此,建议使用 WA 而不是 HM。