Esdaile J M, Horwitz R I
J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(10):841-52. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90086-x.
We review the structure of the two most common observational study designs, cohort and case-control studies, and outline guidelines to help clinicians evaluate the validity of studies that employ these designs. To demonstrate the use of these guidelines we apply them to the important issue of whether oral contraceptive usage may reduce the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. A recent case-control study has contradicted provocative evidence from two previous studies suggesting the existence of such a protective effect. Our analysis leads to the conclusion that the case-control study suggesting no association of oral contraceptives with the subsequent development of rheumatoid arthritis provides the best estimate of the effect of oral contraceptives currently available, and furthermore, the analysis permits recommendations to be made for the design of future investigations on this topic.
我们回顾了两种最常见的观察性研究设计——队列研究和病例对照研究的结构,并概述了一些指导原则,以帮助临床医生评估采用这些设计的研究的有效性。为了说明这些指导原则的应用,我们将其应用于口服避孕药使用是否可降低患类风湿关节炎风险这一重要问题。最近的一项病例对照研究与之前两项研究的煽动性证据相矛盾,之前的研究表明存在这种保护作用。我们的分析得出结论,表明口服避孕药与类风湿关节炎后续发病无关联的病例对照研究提供了目前可得的口服避孕药效果的最佳估计,此外,该分析还可为该主题未来研究的设计提出建议。