Suchy James P, Glasoe Ward M, Koehler Linda A
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 18;15(7):e42089. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42089. eCollection 2023 Jul.
This research compared the reliability and association of tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measures of knee edema to circumferential measurements of knee girth recorded as part of a physical therapy examination.
Twenty adults having observable unilateral knee edema were enrolled. A single examiner measured edematous knee swelling with a TDC device and a tape measure across two visits. The presence of edema was recorded as a positive number in reporting side-to-side differences and a positive percentage in documenting change over time. Intra-rater reliability of the measures was assessed with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Percent change in edema was evaluated independently for both methods using a paired -test, and the association between measures was assessed by a Pearson's statistic.
Both measures were reliable (ICC ≥ 0.81), and both detected a significant percentage decrease ( < 0.05) in edema across visits. The TDC measure changed by 8.3%, an amount nearly four times larger compared to knee girth (2.4%). The subsequent follow-up comparison revealed an inverse relationship ( = 0.049; = -0.44) between the two percent change measurements of edema.
The two methods capture different physical attributes of edema. The TDC records the water content of the tissue, while the use of a tape measure records circumferential limb girth. The TDC measurement was reliable and more responsive in detecting a percentage decrease in knee edema in comparison to a circumferential measure of knee girth. The TDC method may have wider use in directly measuring edema in other tissue structures and regions of the body.
本研究比较了作为物理治疗检查一部分记录的膝关节水肿组织介电常数(TDC)测量值与膝关节周长测量值之间的可靠性及相关性。
招募了20名有明显单侧膝关节水肿的成年人。由一名检查者使用TDC设备和卷尺在两次就诊时测量水肿膝关节的肿胀情况。在报告双侧差异时,水肿的存在记录为正数,在记录随时间的变化时记录为正百分比。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测量值的检查者内可靠性。使用配对t检验独立评估两种方法水肿的百分比变化,并通过Pearson统计量评估测量值之间的相关性。
两种测量方法均可靠(ICC≥0.81),且两次就诊时均检测到水肿有显著百分比下降(P<0.05)。TDC测量值变化了8.3%,几乎是膝关节周长变化量(2.4%)的四倍。随后的随访比较显示,水肿的两个百分比变化测量值之间存在负相关关系(P = 0.049;r = -0.44)。
两种方法捕捉到水肿的不同物理属性。TDC记录组织的含水量,而使用卷尺记录肢体周径。与膝关节周长的周向测量相比,TDC测量在检测膝关节水肿百分比下降方面可靠且更灵敏。TDC方法可能在直接测量身体其他组织结构和区域的水肿方面有更广泛的应用。