Suppr超能文献

尽责性并不调节政治意识形态与易受虚假新闻分享影响之间的关联。

Conscientiousness does not moderate the association between political ideology and susceptibility to fake news sharing.

机构信息

Hill/Levene Schools of Business, University of Regina.

Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3277-3284. doi: 10.1037/xge0001467. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Abstract

Recent work suggests that personality moderates the relationship between political ideology and the sharing of misinformation. Specifically, Lawson and Kakkar (2022) claimed that fake news sharing was driven mostly by low conscientiousness conservatives. We reanalyzed their data and conducted five new preregistered conceptual replications to reexamine their claims ( = 2,433; stopping rule determined via Bayesian sequential sampling). The results did not support their claim that conscientious conservatives shared less fake news; instead, their findings pertain to overall sharing rates (of both true and fake news), rather than specifically to fake news. That is, the association between conscientiousness and misinformation sharing (when it occurs) is explained by lower overall sharing instead of a particular resistance to fake news per se. Our results highlight the importance of distinguishing between overall sharing tendencies and the sharing of misinformation specifically, which have different theoretical and practical implications for how to combat the spread of misinformation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

最近的研究表明,个性会调节政治意识形态和错误信息传播之间的关系。具体来说,Lawson 和 Kakkar(2022 年)声称,虚假新闻的传播主要是由低尽责性的保守派推动的。我们重新分析了他们的数据,并进行了五项新的预先注册的概念复制,以重新检验他们的主张(=2433;通过贝叶斯序贯抽样确定停止规则)。结果不支持他们的观点,即尽责的保守派分享的虚假新闻较少;相反,他们的发现适用于整体分享率(真实和虚假新闻),而不仅仅是虚假新闻。也就是说,尽责性与错误信息分享(如果发生)之间的关联是由较低的整体分享来解释的,而不是对虚假新闻本身的特殊抵制。我们的结果强调了区分整体分享倾向和错误信息分享的重要性,这对于如何打击错误信息的传播具有不同的理论和实践意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验