Service of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Institute of Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Mar;30(3):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
Imaging is a key diagnostic modality for suspected invasive pulmonary or sinus fungal disease and may help to direct testing and treatment. Fungal diagnostic guidelines have been developed and emphasize the role of imaging in this setting. We review and summarize evidence regarding imaging for fungal pulmonary and sinus disease (in particular invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis and pneumocystosis) in immunocompromised patients.
We reviewed data on imaging modalities and findings used for diagnosis of invasive fungal pulmonary and sinus disease.
References for this review were identified by searches of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Web of Science through 1 April 1 2023.
Computed tomography imaging is the method of choice for the evaluation of suspected lung or sinus fungal disease. Although no computed tomography radiologic pattern is pathognomonic of pulmonary invasive fungal disease (IFD) the halo sign firstly suggests an angio-invasive pulmonary aspergillosis while the Reversed Halo Sign is more suggestive of pulmonary mucormycosis in an appropriate clinical setting. The air crescent sign is uncommon, occurring in the later stages of invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic patients. In contrast, new cavitary lesions should suggest IFD in moderately immunocompromised patients. Regarding sinus site, bony erosion, peri-antral fat or septal ulceration are reasonably predictive of IFD.
Imaging assessment of the lung and sinuses is an important component of the diagnostic work-up and management of IFD in immunocompromised patients. However, radiological features signs have sensitivity and specificity that often vary according to underlying disease states. Periodic review of imaging studies and diagnostic guidelines characterizing imaging findings may help clinicians to consider fungal infections in clinical care thereby leading to an earlier confirmation and treatment of IFD.
影像学是疑似侵袭性肺部或鼻窦真菌感染的主要诊断手段,有助于指导检测和治疗。已经制定了真菌诊断指南,强调了影像学在这种情况下的作用。我们回顾和总结了免疫功能低下患者肺部和鼻窦真菌感染(特别是侵袭性曲霉病、毛霉病和肺孢子菌病)的影像学证据。
我们回顾了用于诊断侵袭性肺部和鼻窦真菌感染的影像学方法和发现。
本综述的参考文献通过 2023 年 4 月 1 日在 PubMed、Google Scholar、Embase 和 Web of Science 上的搜索确定。
计算机断层扫描(CT)成像已成为评估疑似肺部或鼻窦真菌感染的首选方法。虽然没有特定的 CT 影像学模式可用于诊断肺部侵袭性真菌感染(IFD),但晕征首先提示血管侵袭性肺曲霉病,而反向晕征在适当的临床环境下更提示肺毛霉病。空气新月征不常见,仅发生于中性粒细胞减少患者侵袭性曲霉病的晚期。相反,对于中度免疫功能低下的患者,新出现的空洞性病变应提示 IFD。对于鼻窦部位,骨侵蚀、前房脂肪或间隔溃疡可合理预测 IFD。
肺部和鼻窦的影像学评估是免疫功能低下患者 IFD 诊断和治疗的重要组成部分。然而,影像学特征的敏感性和特异性通常因基础疾病状态而异。定期复查影像学检查和诊断指南,以明确影像学表现,可能有助于临床医生在临床护理中考虑真菌感染,从而更早地确诊和治疗 IFD。