Suppr超能文献

高负担疟疾环境中长效疟疾化学预防的患者和提供者的偏好。

Preferences of Patients and Providers in High-Burden Malaria Settings for Long-Acting Malaria Chemoprevention.

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Aug 21;109(4):752-760. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0245. Print 2023 Oct 4.

Abstract

Antimalarial medications are recommended for chemoprevention as part of malaria control programs to decrease the morbidity and mortality related to more than 200 million infections each year. We sought to evaluate patient and provider acceptability of malaria chemoprevention in a long-acting formulation. We administered questionnaires to patients and providers in malaria endemic districts in Kenya and Zambia. Questions explored preferences and concerns around long-acting antimalarial formulations compared with oral formulations. We recruited 202 patient respondents (Kenya, n = 102; Zambia, n = 100) and 215 provider respondents (Kenya, n = 105; Zambia, n = 110). Long-acting injection was preferred to oral pills, whereas oral pills were preferred to implant or transdermal administration by patient respondents. Of 202 patient respondents, 80% indicated that they 'definitely would try' malaria chemoprevention offered by injection instead of oral pills. Of parents or guardians, 84% of 113 responded that they 'definitely would' have their child age < 12 years and 90% of 88 'definitely would' have their child ≥12 years receive an injection for malaria prevention. Provider respondents indicated that they would be more likely to prescribe a long-acting injectable product compared with an oral product for malaria chemoprevention in adults (70%), adolescents ages 12 years and older (67%), and children <12 years (81%). Potential for prolonged adverse effects with long-acting products was the highest concern for patient respondents, while higher medication-related cost was cited as the most concerning barrier to implementation by providers. Overall, these findings indicate enthusiasm for the development of long-acting injectable antimalarials to provide individual delivery method options across age groups.

摘要

抗疟药物被推荐作为疟疾控制规划的化学预防措施的一部分,以降低每年超过 2 亿例感染相关的发病率和死亡率。我们旨在评估长效制剂的疟疾化学预防措施在患者和医务人员中的可接受性。我们在肯尼亚和赞比亚的疟疾流行地区向患者和医务人员发放问卷。问卷探讨了长效抗疟制剂与口服制剂相比的偏好和顾虑。我们招募了 202 名患者受访者(肯尼亚 102 名;赞比亚 100 名)和 215 名医务人员受访者(肯尼亚 105 名;赞比亚 110 名)。患者受访者更喜欢长效注射,而不是口服药片,而口服药片则优先于植入或透皮给药。在 202 名患者受访者中,80%表示他们“肯定会尝试”接受注射而不是口服药片提供的疟疾化学预防。在 113 名父母或监护人中,有 84%表示他们“肯定会”让其 12 岁以下的孩子接受注射以预防疟疾,88 名中的 90%表示他们“肯定会”让其 12 岁及以上的孩子接受注射以预防疟疾。医务人员受访者表示,他们更愿意开长效注射产品而不是口服产品来进行成人(70%)、12 岁及以上青少年(67%)和 12 岁以下儿童(81%)的疟疾化学预防。长效产品潜在的长期不良反应是患者受访者最关心的问题,而提供者认为与药物相关的较高费用是实施的最大障碍。总的来说,这些发现表明,人们热衷于开发长效注射抗疟药物,为各年龄段提供个体化的给药方法选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bc/10551098/59fc96c26833/ajtmh.23-0245f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验