Department of Endocrinology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 244, AJC Bose Rd, Kolkata, West Bengal 700020, India.
Department of Endocrinology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3686-3696. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad522.
To investigate the cardiovascular effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with concomitant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) use in heart failure (HF) regardless of ejection fraction (EF) and explore the risk of MRA-associated adverse events in individuals randomized to SGLT2i vs. placebo.
PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials/post-hoc analyses evaluating SGLT2i in HF with or without MRA use (PROSPERO: CRD42023397129). The main outcomes were composite of first hospitalization or urgent visit for HF/cardiovascular death (HHF/CVD), HHF, and CVD. Others were all-cause mortality, composite renal and safety outcomes. Hazard ratios (HR)/risk ratios were extracted. Fixed-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed.
Five eligible studies were included, pooling data from 21 947 people with HF (type 2 diabetes mellitus, n = 10 805). Compared to placebo, randomization to SGLT2i showed a similar reduction in HHF/CVD and HHF in people who were or were not using MRAs [HHF/CVD: hazard ratio (HR) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.81 vs. HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.72-0.86; P-interaction = .43; HHF: HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.67-0.83 vs. HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.63-0.80; P-interaction = .53], with a suggestion of greater relative reduction in CVD in chronic HF people randomized to SGLT2i and using MRAs irrespective of EF (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72-0.91 vs. HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.86-1.13; P-interaction = .034). SGLT2i reduced all-cause mortality (P-interaction = .27) and adverse renal endpoints regardless of MRA use (P-interaction = .73) despite a higher risk of volume depletion with concomitant MRAs (P-interaction = .082). SGLT2i attenuated the risk of mild hyperkalaemia (P-interaction < .001) and severe hyperkalaemia (P-interaction = .051) associated with MRA use.
MRAs did not influence SGLT2i effects on the composite of HHF/CVD, HHF or all-cause mortality; however, findings hinted at a more pronounced relative reduction in CVD in chronic HF patients regardless of EF who were randomized to SGLT2i and receiving an MRA compared to those randomized to SGLT2i and not receiving MRAs. SGLT2i attenuated the risk of MRA-associated treatment-emergent hyperkalaemia. These findings warrant further validation in well-designed randomized controlled trials.
本研究旨在探讨钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)联合盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)治疗心力衰竭(HF)的心血管效应,无论射血分数(EF)如何,并探讨 SGLT2i 与安慰剂相比,随机分组的个体中 MRA 相关不良事件的风险。
检索 PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase 和临床试验注册数据库,以评估 HF 患者中 SGLT2i 联合或不联合 MRA 使用的随机对照试验/事后分析(PROSPERO:CRD42023397129)。主要结局为首次因 HF 或心血管死亡(HHF/CVD)、HHF 而住院或紧急就诊的复合事件、HHF 和心血管疾病。其他结局包括全因死亡率、复合肾脏和安全性结局。提取风险比(HR)/风险比。进行固定效应荟萃分析和亚组分析。
纳入 5 项符合条件的研究,共纳入 21947 名 HF 患者(2 型糖尿病,n=10805)。与安慰剂相比,在使用或不使用 MRA 的患者中,随机给予 SGLT2i 治疗后,HHF/CVD 和 HHF 的发生率相似[HHF/CVD:HR 0.75;95%置信区间(CI)0.68-0.81 与 HR 0.79;95%CI 0.72-0.86;P 交互=.43;HHF:HR 0.74;95%CI 0.67-0.83 与 HR 0.71;95%CI 0.63-0.80;P 交互=.53],但提示无论 EF 如何,在慢性 HF 患者中,与 SGLT2i 和 MRA 联合使用相比,SGLT2i 治疗组 CVD 的相对减少更为显著(HR 0.81;95%CI 0.72-0.91 与 HR 0.98;95%CI 0.86-1.13;P 交互=.034)。SGLT2i 降低了全因死亡率(P 交互=.27)和肾脏不良结局的风险(P 交互=.73),尽管与同时使用 MRA 相关的容量消耗风险更高(P 交互=.082)。SGLT2i 降低了与 MRA 联合使用相关的轻度高钾血症(P 交互<.001)和重度高钾血症(P 交互=.051)的风险。
MRA 并未影响 SGLT2i 对 HHF/CVD、HHF 或全因死亡率的复合结局的影响;然而,研究结果提示,与未接受 MRA 治疗的 SGLT2i 随机分组患者相比,无论 EF 如何,在接受 SGLT2i 和 MRA 治疗的慢性 HF 患者中,CVD 的相对减少更为显著。SGLT2i 降低了 MRA 相关治疗引起的高钾血症的风险。这些发现需要在精心设计的随机对照试验中进一步验证。