Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA.
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2024 Mar;30(3):273-284. doi: 10.1017/S1355617723000462. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
To identify latent trajectories of IQ over time after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and examine the predictive value of risk factors within and across recovery trajectories.
206 children ages 3-7 years at injury were included: 87 TBI (23 severe, 21 moderate, 43 complicated mild) and 119 orthopedic injury (OI). We administered intelligence tests shortly after injury (1½ months), 12 months, and 6.8 years postinjury. Latent class growth modeling was used to identify latent subgroups. Separate models examined verbal and nonverbal IQ recovery trajectories following TBI versus OI. Variables included: age at injury, sex, race, socioeconomic status, injury severity, quality of the home environment, family functioning, and parenting style.
Both the TBI and OI analyses yielded different growth models for nonverbal ( = 3) and verbal IQ ( = 3). Although all models resulted in 3 latent classes (below average, average, and aboveaverage performance); trajectory shapes, contributors to class membership, and performance within each class varied by injury group and IQ domain. TBI severity was associated with class membership for nonverbal IQ, with less severe injuries associated with higher IQ scores; however, TBI severity did not influence verbal IQ class membership. Parenting style had a more prominent effect on verbal and nonverbal IQ within the TBI than OI trajectories.
Findings suggest TBI severity is related to recovery trajectories for nonverbal but not verbal IQ and parenting style has stronger effects on recovery in TBI than OI. Results highlight the importance of parental factors on long-term recovery after TBI.
确定儿童创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后智商随时间的潜在轨迹,并研究恢复轨迹内和轨迹间的风险因素的预测价值。
共纳入 206 名 3-7 岁的儿童,其中 87 名患有 TBI(23 名重度、21 名中度、43 名复杂轻度),119 名患有骨科损伤(OI)。我们在受伤后 1.5 个月、12 个月和 6.8 年后进行智力测试。使用潜在类别增长模型识别潜在亚组。分别的模型检验了 TBI 与 OI 后言语和非言语 IQ 的恢复轨迹。变量包括:受伤时的年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位、受伤严重程度、家庭环境质量、家庭功能和育儿方式。
TBI 和 OI 分析均产生了非言语( = 3)和言语 IQ( = 3)的不同增长模型。尽管所有模型都产生了 3 个潜在类别(低于平均水平、平均水平和高于平均水平);但轨迹形状、类别的决定因素以及每个类别的表现因损伤组和 IQ 领域而异。TBI 严重程度与非言语 IQ 的类别成员有关,较轻的损伤与较高的 IQ 分数相关;然而,TBI 严重程度并不影响言语 IQ 类别的成员。在 TBI 轨迹中,育儿方式对言语和非言语 IQ 的影响比 OI 更大。
研究结果表明,TBI 严重程度与非言语但不是言语 IQ 的恢复轨迹有关,育儿方式对 TBI 的恢复比 OI 更有影响。研究结果强调了父母因素对 TBI 后长期恢复的重要性。