Oxford Heart Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Cardiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Heart. 2024 Aug 14;110(17):1099-1106. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-322001.
Severe secondary mitral regurgitation carries a poor prognosis with one in five patients dying within 12 months of diagnosis. Fortunately, there are now a number of safe and effective therapies available to improve outcomes. Here, we summarise the most up-to-date treatments. Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is the mainstay therapy and has been shown to reduce the severity of mitral regurgitation in 40-45% of patients. Rapid medication titration protocols reduce heart failure hospitalisation and facilitate earlier referral for device therapy. The pursuit of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation has been shown to significantly reduce mitral regurgitation severity, as has the use of cardiac resynchronisation devices in patients who meet guideline-directed criteria. Finally, we highlight the key role of mitral valve intervention, particularly transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for management of moderate-severe mitral regurgitation in carefully selected patients with poor left ventricular systolic function, with a number needed to treat of 3.1 to reduce heart failure hospitalisation and 5.9 to reduce all-cause death. To slow the rapid accumulation of morbidity and mortality, we advocate a proactive approach with accelerated medical optimisation, followed by management of atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronisation therapy if indicated, then, rapid referral to the Heart Team for consideration of mitral valve intervention in patients with ongoing symptoms and at least moderate-severe mitral regurgitation. Mitral TEER has been shown to be 'reasonably cost-effective' (but not cost-saving) in the UK in selected patients, although TEER remains underused with only 6.5 procedures per million population (pmp) compared with Germany (77 pmp), Switzerland (44 pmp) and the USA (32 pmp).
严重的二尖瓣反流预后不良,五分之一的患者在诊断后 12 个月内死亡。幸运的是,现在有许多安全有效的治疗方法可以改善预后。在这里,我们总结了最新的治疗方法。最佳指南导向的药物治疗是主要的治疗方法,已经证明可以使 40-45%的患者的二尖瓣反流程度减轻。快速药物滴定方案可减少心力衰竭住院次数,并促进更早转介进行器械治疗。在有房颤的患者中追求窦性心律已被证明可显著降低二尖瓣反流程度,而在符合指南指导标准的患者中使用心脏再同步治疗设备也是如此。最后,我们强调了二尖瓣介入治疗的关键作用,特别是在精心挑选的左心室收缩功能差的中度至重度二尖瓣反流患者中,经导管缘对缘修复(TEER)可治疗,其治疗需要数为 3.1 可减少心力衰竭住院次数,5.9 可减少全因死亡。为了减缓发病率和死亡率的快速积累,我们提倡采取积极主动的方法,加速药物优化,然后管理房颤和心脏再同步治疗,如果有必要,然后迅速将患者转介给心脏团队,考虑对有持续症状和至少中度至重度二尖瓣反流的患者进行二尖瓣介入治疗。在英国,二尖瓣 TEER 已被证明在某些患者中具有“合理的成本效益”(但不是节省成本),尽管与德国(77 pmp)、瑞士(44 pmp)和美国(32 pmp)相比,TEER 的使用率仍然较低,每百万人中只有 6.5 例(pmp)。