Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Sex Transm Infect. 2023 Dec;99(8):534-540. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2023-055840. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
BACKGROUND: The potential of HIV self-testing (HIVST) to cause harm is a concern hindering widespread implementation. The aim of this paper is to understand the relationship between HIVST and harm in SELPHI (An HIV f-testing ublic ealth ntervention), the largest randomised trial of HIVST in a high-income country to date. METHODS: 10 111 cis and trans men who have sex with men (MSM) recruited online (geolocation social/sexual networking apps, social media), aged 16+, reporting previous anal intercourse and resident in England or Wales were first randomised 60/40 to baseline HIVST (baseline testing, BT) or not (no baseline testing, nBT) (randomisation A). BT participants reporting negative baseline test, sexual risk at 3 months and interest in further HIVST were randomised to three-monthly HIVST (repeat testing, RT) or not (no repeat testing, nRT) (randomisation B). All received an exit survey collecting data on harms (to relationships, well-being, false results or being pressured/persuaded to test). Nine participants reporting harm were interviewed in-depth about their experiences in an exploratory substudy; qualitative data were analysed narratively. RESULTS: Baseline: predominantly cis MSM, 90% white, 88% gay, 47% university educated and 7% current/former pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users. Final survey response rate was: nBT=26% (1056/4062), BT=45% (1674/3741), nRT=41% (471/1147), RT=50% (581/1161).Harms were rare and reported by 4% (n=138/3691) in exit surveys, with an additional two false positive results captured in other study surveys. 1% reported harm to relationships and to well-being in BT, nRT and RT combined. In all arms combined, being pressured or persuaded to test was reported by 1% (n=54/3678) and false positive results in 0.7% (n=34/4665).Qualitative analysis revealed harms arose from the kit itself (technological harms), the intervention (intervention harms) or from the social context of the participant (socially emergent harms). Intervention and socially emergent harms did not reduce HIVST acceptability, whereas technological harms did. DISCUSSION: HIVST harms were rare but strategies to link individuals experiencing harms with psychosocial support should be considered for HIVST scale-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN20312003.
背景:艾滋病毒自我检测(HIVST)可能造成危害,这一潜在问题阻碍了其广泛应用。本文旨在了解 SELPHI(一项艾滋病毒检测公共卫生干预措施)中 HIVST 与危害之间的关系,这是迄今为止在高收入国家中进行的最大规模的 HIVST 随机试验。
方法:10111 名男男性行为者(MSM)通过网络(地理位置社交/性网络应用程序、社交媒体)招募,年龄在 16 岁及以上,报告有过肛门性交且居住在英格兰或威尔士,他们首先被随机分为 60/40 组,分别进行基线 HIVST(基线检测,BT)或不进行(无基线检测,nBT)(随机分组 A)。BT 组参与者报告阴性基线检测结果、3 个月时的性风险,并表示有进一步进行 HIVST 的兴趣,他们被随机分为每三个月进行一次 HIVST(重复检测,RT)或不进行(无重复检测,nRT)(随机分组 B)。所有参与者都填写了一份出口调查问卷,收集有关危害(对人际关系、幸福感、假结果或被施压/说服进行检测)的数据。9 名报告危害的参与者在一项探索性子研究中接受了深入访谈,对其经历进行了定性分析。
结果:基线:主要为 cis MSM,90%为白人,88%为同性恋,47%受过大学教育,7%为当前/以前的暴露前预防(PrEP)使用者。最终调查的回复率为:nBT=26%(1056/4062),BT=45%(1674/3741),nRT=41%(471/1147),RT=50%(581/1161)。出口调查中,4%(n=138/3691)报告了危害,其他研究调查中还发现了另外两例假阳性结果。BT、nRT 和 RT 联合组中,1%的参与者报告了对人际关系和幸福感的危害。所有组中,1%(n=54/3678)报告了被施压或被说服进行检测,0.7%(n=34/4665)报告了假阳性结果。定性分析显示,危害源于检测试剂盒本身(技术危害)、干预措施(干预危害)或参与者的社会环境(社会新兴危害)。干预和社会新兴危害并没有降低 HIVST 的可接受性,而技术危害则降低了 HIVST 的可接受性。
讨论:HIVST 危害很少见,但应该考虑为经历危害的个人提供心理社会支持,作为 HIVST 推广的策略。
试验注册编号:ISRCTN20312003。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-1-10
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-1-10