Suppr超能文献

在软组织肉瘤的新辅助治疗中,化疗放疗联合热疗(CRTH)与单纯化疗放疗(CRT)相比:肿瘤反应、治疗毒性和疾病控制。

Chemoradiotherapy plus hyperthermia (CRTH) versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone in neoadjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: tumor response, treatment toxicity and disease control.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2023;40(1):2248424. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2248424.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are still preferably delivered sequentially, with or without concurrent hyperthermia. Concurrent delivery of chemo-, radio- and thermotherapy may produce synergistic effects and reduce chemotherapy-free intervals. The few available studies suggest that concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) has a greater local effect. Data on the efficacy and toxicity of adding hyperthermia to CRT (CRTH) are sparse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 101 patients with STS of the extremities and trunk who received CRT ( = 33) or CRTH ( = 68) before resection of macroscopic tumor (CRT:  = 19, CRTH:  = 49) or re-resection following a non-oncological resection, so called 'whoops procedure', (CRT:  = 14, CRTH:  = 19) were included in this retrospective study. CRT consisted of two cycles of doxorubicine (50 mg/m on d2) plus ifosfamide (1500 mg/m on d1-5, q28) plus radiation doses of up to 60 Gy. Hyperthermia was delivered in two sessions per week.

RESULTS

All patients received the minimum dose of 50 Gy. Median doses of ifosfamide and doxorubicin were comparable between CRT (75%/95%) and CRTH (78%/97%). The median number of hyperthermia sessions was seven. There were no differences in acute toxicities. Major wound complications occurred in 15% (CRT) vs. 25% (CRTH) ( = 0.19). In patients with macroscopic disease, the addition of hyperthermia resulted in a tendency toward improved remission: regression ≥90% occurred in 21/48 (CRTH) vs. 4/18 (CRT) patients ( = 0.197). With a median postoperative follow-up of 72 months, 6-year local control and overall survival rates for CRTH vs. CRT alone were 85 vs. 78% ( = 0.938) and 79 vs. 71% ( = 0.215).

CONCLUSIONS

Both CRT and CRTH are well tolerated with an expected rate of wound complications. The results suggest that adding hyperthermia may improve tumor response.

摘要

简介

软组织肉瘤(STS)的新辅助化疗和放疗仍然最好是顺序进行,无论是否同时进行高温治疗。化疗、放疗和热疗的同时应用可能会产生协同作用,减少化疗间隔时间。为数不多的可用研究表明,同期放化疗(CRT)具有更大的局部效果。关于高温治疗联合 CRT(CRTH)的疗效和毒性的数据很少。

材料和方法

我们回顾性分析了 101 例接受 CRT(n=33)或 CRTH(n=68)治疗的四肢和躯干 STS 患者的资料,这些患者在接受根治性切除(CRT:n=19,CRTH:n=49)或非肿瘤性切除后的再次切除(所谓的“失误切除”,CRT:n=14,CRTH:n=19)前接受了治疗。CRT 包括两个周期的多柔比星(50mg/m2,第 2 天)加异环磷酰胺(1500mg/m2,第 1-5 天,每 28 天一次)和高达 60Gy 的放疗剂量。高温治疗每周进行两次。

结果

所有患者均接受了最低剂量 50Gy。CRT(75%/95%)和 CRTH(78%/97%)中异环磷酰胺和多柔比星的中位剂量相当。中位高温治疗次数为 7 次。急性毒性无差异。主要伤口并发症在 15%(CRT)和 25%(CRTH)的患者中发生( = 0.19)。在有宏观疾病的患者中,高温治疗的加入有改善缓解的趋势:在 48 例(CRTH)中有 21 例(21/48)和 18 例(CRT)中有 4 例(4/18)患者的肿瘤消退≥90%( = 0.197)。在中位术后随访 72 个月后,CRTH 与单独 CRT 的 6 年局部控制率和总生存率分别为 85%和 78%( = 0.938)和 79%和 71%( = 0.215)。

结论

CRT 和 CRTH 均耐受良好,预计伤口并发症发生率相同。结果表明,高温治疗的加入可能会改善肿瘤反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验