Department of Geography, Environmental Sustainability and Resilience Building, Midlands State University, P. Bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):100248-100264. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29391-y. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
Institutional solid waste management is a critical contemporary crisis in Zimbabwe due to rapid urbanisation, disease outbreaks and population growth. Traditional approach to institutional solid waste management is almost fragmented, with various departments accountable for numerous aspects of the management process. Deficiency of coordination as well as integration among responsible stakeholders and failure to include different management strategies resulted in institutional solid waste management inefficiencies. This translates to increased environmental health problems. Therefore, this review aims to assess the effectiveness of integrated management systems in institutional solid waste management in Zimbabwe. The review was compiled using already existing literature. Institutions regarded as sources of solid waste in Zimbabwe include learning and health institutions. Barracks, prisons and police camps are part of the institutions. The institutions generate hazardous, non-hazardous, biodegradable and non-biodegradable solid waste. Solid waste from institutions is indiscriminately stored, collected and disposed through landfilling, incineration, burning, open pits and on non-designated open spaces. Most of the disposal strategies are least prioritised by the waste management hierarchy, hence have potential to cause environmental health risks. Utilisation of inappropriate management strategies is exacerbated by shortage of resources, ineffective legal framework, lack of all stakeholder participation and inadequate investment in waste reduction alternatives. Integrated institutional solid waste management is effective since it enhances involvement of all responsible stakeholders and application of various waste reduction alternatives particularly those which support circular economy. Through integrated approach, quantity of institutional solid waste disposed is limited, therefore minimising environmental health risks while maximising dumpsites lifespan.
由于城市化进程加快、疾病爆发和人口增长,津巴布韦的机构固体废物管理目前是一个严峻的问题。传统的机构固体废物管理方法几乎是分散的,各个部门负责管理过程的许多方面。由于负责的利益相关者之间缺乏协调和整合,以及未能纳入不同的管理策略,导致机构固体废物管理效率低下。这导致了更多的环境卫生问题。因此,本综述旨在评估津巴布韦综合管理制度在机构固体废物管理中的有效性。综述的编制使用了现有的文献。被视为津巴布韦固体废物来源的机构包括学习和医疗机构。兵营、监狱和警察营地是这些机构的一部分。这些机构产生危险废物、无害废物、可生物降解废物和不可生物降解废物。机构产生的固体废物通过垃圾填埋、焚烧、燃烧、露天坑和非指定的露天场所进行随意储存、收集和处理。大多数处置策略在废物管理层次结构中优先级最低,因此有潜在的环境健康风险。由于资源短缺、法律框架无效、缺乏所有利益相关者的参与以及对废物减少替代方案的投资不足,导致不适当的管理策略的利用更加恶化。综合机构固体废物管理是有效的,因为它增强了所有负责的利益相关者的参与,并应用了各种废物减少替代方案,特别是那些支持循环经济的方案。通过综合方法,处置的机构固体废物的数量受到限制,从而最大限度地减少了环境健康风险,同时最大限度地延长了垃圾填埋场的使用寿命。