Hao Zhiwei, Wang Zhijun, Wang Yifan, Duan Conghui, Ji Qing
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, 030051, China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 24;13(1):13851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38680-y.
In order to solve the problem of insufficient penetration ability of common liner, a new three-layer liner was proposed. AUTODYN software was used to simulate the efflux forming process of three-layer liner. The influence of four different impact impedance liner materials and different thickness ratio of three-layer liner on efflux performance was studied. In order to study the penetration ability of shaped charge to semi-infinite target plate, the penetration calculation of the target plate was carried out by taking several standoff under different thickness ratios. The optimal thickness ratio of three-layer liner was determined by studying the penetration depth and opening size of the target plate. The results show: By comparing the matching of liner materials with different impact impedances, the head velocity, effective length, total energy, total kinetic energy and effective jet mass of the jet formed when the three-layer liner material is AL 2024, copper and nickel from the outside to the inside are the best. In the analysis of the matching of the thickness ratio of the three-layer liner, the key to the jet forming is the thickness ratio of the outer liner. Within a certain range, the greater the proportion of the thickness of the outer liner, the better the jet forming; when the material of the three-layer liner is AL 2024-copper-nickel from outside to inside, the thickness ratio of the liner is 4/1/1 from outside to inside, and the jet forming is the best. The maximum penetration depth of the shaped charge with a thickness ratio of 1/1/4 from the outside to the inside of the three-layer liner is 395.5 mm, which is 52.3% higher than that of the shaped charge with a double-layer liner. Compared with the shaped charge with single-layer liner, the penetration depth is increased by 62.6%. When the thickness ratio of the three-layer liner is 1/1/4 from the outside to the inside, the maximum entrance diameter of the target plate is 14.3 mm, which is the same as that of the shaped charge with the double-layer liner. Compared with the shaped charge with single-layer liner, the entrance diameter is in-creased by 14.4%.
为解决普通药型罩侵彻能力不足的问题,提出了一种新型三层药型罩。采用AUTODYN软件对三层药型罩的射流形成过程进行模拟。研究了四种不同冲击阻抗药型罩材料以及三层药型罩不同厚度比对射流性能的影响。为研究聚能装药对半无限靶板的侵彻能力,在不同厚度比下取几种炸高对靶板进行侵彻计算。通过研究靶板的侵彻深度和开孔尺寸确定了三层药型罩的最佳厚度比。结果表明:通过比较不同冲击阻抗药型罩材料的匹配情况,三层药型罩材料由外向内为AL 2024、铜、镍时形成的射流头部速度、有效长度、总能量、总动能和有效射流质量最佳。在三层药型罩厚度比匹配分析中,射流形成的关键在于外层药型罩的厚度比。在一定范围内,外层药型罩厚度所占比例越大,射流形成越好;当三层药型罩材料由外向内为AL 2024-铜-镍时,药型罩厚度比由外向内为4/1/1时,射流形成最佳。三层药型罩由外向内厚度比为1/1/4的聚能装药最大侵彻深度为395.5mm,比双层药型罩聚能装药提高了52.3%。与单层药型罩聚能装药相比,侵彻深度提高了62.6%。当三层药型罩由外向内厚度比为1/1/4时,靶板最大入口直径为14.3mm,与双层药型罩聚能装药相同。与单层药型罩聚能装药相比,入口直径增大了14.4%。