• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先天性上肢差异:6 年文献回顾。

Congenital Upper-Limb Differences: A 6-Year Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1537-1549. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.01323. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.22.01323
PMID:37624908
Abstract

➤ The Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) classification of congenital hand and upper-limb anomalies continues to be refined as our understanding of the genetic and embryonic etiology of limb anomalies improves.➤ We have conducted an evaluation of graft and graftless techniques for syndactyly reconstruction; strengths and drawbacks exist for each technique.➤ Treatment for radial longitudinal deficiency remains controversial; however, radialization has shown promise in early follow-up for severe deformities.➤ Recent emphasis on psychosocial aspects of care has demonstrated that children with congenital upper-limb differences demonstrate good peer relationships and marked adaptability.

摘要

➤ 随着我们对肢体畸形的遗传和胚胎病因的理解不断深入,奥伯格-曼斯克-东金(OMT)分类法继续得到完善。➤ 我们对并指畸形重建的植骨和非植骨技术进行了评估;每种技术都有其优缺点。➤ 桡侧纵向发育不全的治疗仍存在争议;然而,对于严重畸形,桡侧化在早期随访中显示出了良好的效果。➤ 最近对护理的社会心理方面的重视表明,患有先天性上肢差异的儿童具有良好的同伴关系和明显的适应能力。

相似文献

1
Congenital Upper-Limb Differences: A 6-Year Literature Review.先天性上肢差异:6 年文献回顾。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1537-1549. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.01323. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
2
The Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) Classification of Congenital Upper Extremities: Update for 2020.先天性上肢的奥伯格-曼斯克-汤金(OMT)分类:2020年更新
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Jun;45(6):542-547. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
The Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin Classification of Congenital Upper Limb Anomalies: A Consensus Decision-Making Study for Difficult or Unclassifiable Cases.奥伯格、曼斯克和汤金先天性上肢畸形分类:困难或无法分类病例的共识决策研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Apr;49(4):379.e1-379.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
4
Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin (OMT) Classification: Establishing a Registry on Congenital Upper Limb Differences.奥伯格-曼斯克-汤金(OMT)分类的观察者内和观察者间可靠性:建立先天性上肢差异登记处
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Jan;38(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000732.
5
Commentary on "Views on the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin Classification System for Congenital Anomalies of the Hand and Upper Limb".关于《手部及上肢先天性畸形的奥伯格-曼斯克-汤金分类系统之观点》的述评
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 May;42(5):382-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.02.019.
6
Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin classification of congenital upper limb anomalies.Oberg-Manske-Tonkin 先天性上肢畸形分类的组内和组间可靠性。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Nov;47(10):1016-1024. doi: 10.1177/17531934221107264. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Classification of congenital anomalies of the hand and upper limb: development and assessment of a new system.手部及上肢先天性畸形的分类:一种新系统的发展与评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Sep;38(9):1845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.019. Epub 2013 May 17.
8
Commentary on Sletten et al.: Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Oberg-Manske-Tonkin classification of congenital upper limb anomalies.关于斯莱滕等人的评论:先天性上肢畸形的奥伯格-曼斯克-汤金分类法的评分者间和评分者内信度
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Nov;47(10):1025-1026. doi: 10.1177/17531934221123447. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
Re-examining the nomenclature of congenital failure of formation in the upper limb: a historical perspective.重新审视上肢先天性形成不全的命名法:历史视角。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Dec;48(11):1159-1167. doi: 10.1177/17531934231160400. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in a midwest United States population: an assessment using the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification.美国中西部人群先天性上肢畸形的流行病学:使用奥伯格、曼斯克和汤金分类法进行的评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jan;40(1):127-32.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.038.