• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诺氟沙星与其他抗生素预防肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Norfloxacin versus alternative antibiotics for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacteria peritonitis in cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, NO.37 GuoXue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08557-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-023-08557-6
PMID:37641014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10463656/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a life-threatening complication in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Prophylactic Norfloxacin used to be considered effective in SBP prevention, but in recent years its efficacy has been partially compromised by increasing quinolone-resistant bacteria. However, whether the effects of alternative prophylactic regimens are superior to norfloxacin remains controversial. The goal of this study is to compare the effects of norfloxacin with other antibiotics in SBP prophylaxis for cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Databases. Two reviewers independently identified relevant random control trials (RCTs) comparing the role of norfloxacin and other antibiotics in SBP prevention.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 1043 cirrhotic patients were included in this study. Norfloxacin and alternative antibiotics displayed comparable effects in SBP prophylaxis, survival benefit, overall infection prevention, and safety. Subgroup analyses revealed that rifaximin prophylaxis could reduce the recurrence of SBP with fewer adverse events but failed to improve overall survival compared with norfloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Other antibiotics are a reasonable alternative to norfloxacin in the prophylaxis of SBP. Rifaximin prophylaxis could be an alternative choose of antibiotic for SBP prevention because of its better protective effect and safety.

摘要

背景

自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)是肝硬化患者的一种危及生命的并发症。预防性使用诺氟沙星曾经被认为对 SBP 的预防有效,但近年来,由于耐喹诺酮类细菌的增加,其疗效已部分受到影响。然而,替代预防方案的效果是否优于诺氟沙星仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较诺氟沙星与其他抗生素在肝硬化患者 SBP 预防中的作用。

方法

我们系统地检索了 Pubmed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库。两位审查员独立识别了比较诺氟沙星和其他抗生素在 SBP 预防作用的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。

结果

本研究共纳入了 8 项研究,包括 1043 例肝硬化患者。诺氟沙星和其他抗生素在 SBP 预防、生存获益、总体感染预防和安全性方面的效果相当。亚组分析显示,利福昔明预防可降低 SBP 的复发,且不良反应较少,但与诺氟沙星相比,并未改善总体生存率。

结论

其他抗生素是预防 SBP 的一种合理替代诺氟沙星的方法。利福昔明预防可能是 SBP 预防的抗生素替代选择,因为它具有更好的保护作用和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/765dd92e9576/12879_2023_8557_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/61564ca4a3b8/12879_2023_8557_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/3bbdd027b50d/12879_2023_8557_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/bfd01a104eaf/12879_2023_8557_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/020403355834/12879_2023_8557_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/55653f12ad44/12879_2023_8557_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/765dd92e9576/12879_2023_8557_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/61564ca4a3b8/12879_2023_8557_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/3bbdd027b50d/12879_2023_8557_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/bfd01a104eaf/12879_2023_8557_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/020403355834/12879_2023_8557_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/55653f12ad44/12879_2023_8557_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a794/10463656/765dd92e9576/12879_2023_8557_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Norfloxacin versus alternative antibiotics for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacteria peritonitis in cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.诺氟沙星与其他抗生素预防肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08557-6.
2
Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.抗生素预防肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 16;1(1):CD013125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013125.pub2.
3
Randomized-controlled trial of rifaximin versus norfloxacin for secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.利福昔明与诺氟沙星用于自发性细菌性腹膜炎二级预防的随机对照试验。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;28(12):1450-1454. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000724.
4
Antibiotics for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: systematic review & Bayesian network meta-analysis.预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎的抗生素:系统评价与贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Hepatol Int. 2020 May;14(3):399-413. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10025-1. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
5
Efficacy and safety of alternating norfloxacin and rifaximin as primary prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic ascites: a prospective randomized open-label comparative multicenter study.交替使用诺氟沙星和利福昔明作为肝硬化腹水自发性细菌性腹膜炎的初级预防的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性随机开放标签比较多中心研究。
Hepatol Int. 2016 Mar;10(2):377-85. doi: 10.1007/s12072-015-9688-z. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
6
Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in liver cirrhosis: systematic review.抗生素预防肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎:系统评价。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Apr-Jun;84(2):333-342. doi: 10.51821/84.2.333.
7
The efficacy and the immunomodulatory effect of rifaximin in prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic Egyptian patients.利福昔明对埃及肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的预防效果及免疫调节作用
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;26(2):163-9. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.7782.
8
Efficacy of Norfloxacin Prophylaxis to Prevent Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氟喹诺酮类药物预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;11(8):e00223. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000223.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Rifaximin in Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.利福昔明预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Drug Targets. 2019;20(4):380-387. doi: 10.2174/1389450119666180924145156.
10
Rifaximin for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利福昔明预防肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎和肝肾综合征:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;29(10):1109-1117. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000940.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluoroquinolones for the Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: Are They Losing Ground?氟喹诺酮类药物用于肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的预防:它们正在失宠吗?
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;15(4):586. doi: 10.3390/life15040586.
2
Impact of Quinolone Prophylaxis on Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Mortality in Cirrhosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.喹诺酮预防性用药对肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎及死亡率的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
JGH Open. 2025 Apr 17;9(4):e70148. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70148. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Rifaximin Vs. Norfloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.利福昔明与诺氟沙星用于自发性细菌性腹膜炎预防的随机对照试验
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 Mar-Apr;12(2):336-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
The Evolving Challenge of Infections in Cirrhosis.肝硬化中感染问题的不断演变的挑战
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 17;384(24):2317-2330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2021808.
3
Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Bacterial Infections in Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, and Management.
慢性肝衰竭急性发作时的细菌感染:流行病学、诊断、发病机制及管理
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2024 Jul 28;12(7):667-676. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2024.00137. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
腹水、自发性细菌性腹膜炎和肝肾综合征的诊断、评估及管理:美国肝病研究协会2021年实践指南
Hepatology. 2021 Aug;74(2):1014-1048. doi: 10.1002/hep.31884.
4
Efficacy of Norfloxacin Prophylaxis to Prevent Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氟喹诺酮类药物预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;11(8):e00223. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000223.
5
Antibiotics for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: systematic review & Bayesian network meta-analysis.预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎的抗生素:系统评价与贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Hepatol Int. 2020 May;14(3):399-413. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10025-1. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
6
Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.抗生素预防肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 16;1(1):CD013125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013125.pub2.
7
Primary and secondary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: current state of the art.自发性细菌性腹膜炎的一级和二级预防:最新进展。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;13(8):751-759. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1644167. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
Nosocomial Infections Are Frequent and Negatively Impact Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cirrhosis.医院获得性感染在住院肝硬化患者中很常见,对患者预后产生负面影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;114(7):1091-1100. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000280.
9
Acute kidney injury is associated with higher mortality and healthcare costs in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.急性肾损伤与肝硬化住院患者的死亡率和医疗保健费用升高有关。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Sep-Oct;18(5):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 May 23.
10
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by Gram-negative bacteria: an update of epidemiology and antimicrobial treatments.由革兰氏阴性菌引起的自发性细菌性腹膜炎:流行病学和抗菌治疗的更新。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;13(7):683-692. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1621167. Epub 2019 May 29.